Current news items
Clippings and links to news articles involving country greens
Liberal candidate for Monbulk Matthew Mills said under the Victorian Coalition’s plan, 100 extra transit police would be added to Victoria’s train network, and two Victoria protective services officers would be stationed at every train station from 6pm until the last train. Tecoma and Upwey stations are both currently unmanned.
Greens candidate Jo Tenner said her party planned to fully staff all train stations from the first to the last train.
“Many people I have spoken with around the electorate have told me that they do not feel safe using the unstaffed stations, they also expressed concerns about the level of vandalism and graffiti at the stations,” she said. Ms Tenner said if permanent staff were employed, then waiting areas and toilets could be opened and tourists provided with directions, making the station a real hub of the town.
Staff from Indian restaurant Saffron Cottage in Tecoma recently quit after being racially taunted and threatened with violence at Tecoma station. Restaurant owner Nikky Salgadoe said she supported the station being staffed at all times. Monbulk state Labor MP James Merlino said there had been more than a 50 per cent increase in public transport over the past 10 years, yet the crime rate had continued to drop.
Mr Merlino said Victoria Police and Metro continued to work together to identify hot spots across the rail network.
He said the Victorian Transport Plan had a further commitment to engage 50 new transit police, and more than 500 authorised officers were already employed across the Victorian public transport network.
Push for better safety at train stations in the hills
KIMBERLEY SEEDY, Free Press Leader 5th May 2010
The ABC has rejected pleas from the Greens to be allowed to broadcast a striking yet fake election advertisement that was created for the broadcaster.
The party confirmed it wants to use an advertisement created by agency Republic of Everyone that featured on the Gruen Nation last night.
But the ABC will not allow it to be used during the campaign, stating it owns the rights and the "ABC can't provide one side's advertising".
A scene from the fake Greens ad showing on Gruen Nation.
The "fake ad" was created as part of "The Pitch"- a segment in which two advertising agencies were asked to create an advertisement about the Greens.
The 30-second clip focused on issues such as gay marriage, climate change and dental care and has been viewed more than 3400 times this morning on YouTube.
Republic of Everyone's Ben Peacock said on the Gruen Nation that its creation aimed to show the Greens' stance on multiple issues, not just the environment.
The Greens Senator, Bob Brown, said he thought the ad was "great."
"And it got right to the point. The Greens have normally had a struggle to stay in election campaigns because of the spending of the old parties. We’ll give them a run for their money this time."
"Maybe Gruen Nation could run that ad again next week, that would be a start," Senator Brown said.
Gruen panelist and Leo Burnett chief executive Todd Sampson told Mr Peacock "it was the best ad the Greens have ever done" and to "expect a phone call".
And that call came this morning.
Greens spokeswoman Ebony Bennett confirmed the party had contacted Republic of Everyone and the ABC asking to use the advertisement.
"We rang the Republic of Everyone first thing this morning as we had a huge response following last night and we were inundated with requests to get it on air," Ms Bennett said.
But an ABC spokesman said the broadcaster would not provide the "fake Greens" advertisement.
"ABC TV will not be providing the fake Greens ads to the Greens party, because the ad was made specifically for Gruen Nation," he said.
The Gruen Nation's Twitter account also tweeted a short time ago that "Greens can't buy or run brill Gruen Nation ad ... ABC can't provide one side's advertising".
Ms Bennett denied the fake advertisement was better than those created by the party.
"I think all our ads have been fantastic," she said.
"This just came out of nowhere. I think people are really disillusioned by the major parties and what they believe ... and [this advertisement] speaks to the core of what the Greens believe in."
Ms Bennett said the party had placed links to the video on its Facebook and Twitter pages.
Mr Peacock said the response since the Gruen Nation had been phenomenal.
He also refrained from criticising the ABC for not releasing the advertisement to the Greens.
"Clearly I would love to see it on TV but at the same time I don't think it is a question of won't for the ABC; it is that they can't ... be giving ads to political parties and I totally sympathise with them," he said.
Mr Peacock said the clip took over a week to produce and was the first idea floated by his team.
He said the advertisement "worked because it was positive" and is based "on real issues".
"I really would like to see this change the way political parties view advertising and show them it can be positive," he said.
"I would also hope from a corporate [advertising] point of view that they can realise the power in sustainable and positive messages."
with Louise Hall
CARDINIA Shire has an all-male council following the weekend’s election.
The only woman candidate, Kate Lempriere, bows out, and the other five women who stood – Catherine Manning, Kate Hands, Tracy Montgomery, Gloria O’Connor and Linda Hamilton – also attracted too few votes to survive.
In neighbouring Casey the story is different, with a record five women to take their place in the 11-member council.
Casey is one of only a couple of councils with five women, following the 2008 poll.
Casey voters returned finance broker Lorraine Wreford in Springfield Ward for another term. The other four successful female candidates will be first-time Casey councillors.
Volunteer and family carer Shar Balmes, with Karen Baxter, will tip the gender in Four Oaks Ward, where voters threw out Paul Richardson and Rob Wilson.
Amanda Stapleton sets some gender balance in Mayfield, where the voting system returned the person currently under an investigation for breach of the council’s code of conduct, Kevin Bradford.
In River Gum Ward, mother and carer Lynette Keleher for the Greens will balance the gender with returning councillor Wayne Smith, who shared the ward with former mayor Janet Halsall.
Speaking after the Cardinia result on Monday, Ms Lempriere said that while democracy had spoken, Cardinia Shire would be at a disadvantage without a female at the council table.
“The one thing I am disappointed about is that there are no women,” she said. “Women give a different approach, a different perspective, not better nor worse, just different.
“I would have liked to have seen Catherine (Manning) or Kate (Hands) there because it would have given a bit of balance. They would have been a great asset to this council.
“I am concerned about the arts. I was the only one who championed the arts. The men are into sport, sport, sport.”
Gloria O’Connor, who ran for Bunyip Ward, agreed it was a shame the voters elected no women.
“It’s a pity that of seven councillors there isn’t a capable female, from the public’s perspective,” she said.
Catherine Manning, who ran for Port Ward, said there were plenty of quality female candidates on Cardinia’s ballot papers.
“I’m disappointed there’s not one female at least to represent Cardinia’s population,” she said.
“At this time in 2008, I would have expected a couple of females to be elected onto council. It’s important to have balance.”
“The council has the potential to be seen as a boys’ club, but let’s hope they prove us wrong.”
http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/story/67487
The Supreme Court today refused VicForests' application for up to $163,000 in security from a small environment group. VicForests was asking for this sum to be secured before a court injunction is granted to stop logging on Brown Mountain.
"If EEG had been required to pay such a large sum of money, it could have stifled an important piece of public interest litigation", said EEG spokesperson Jill Redwood.
"This is a groundbreaking decision because no Victorian court has ever ordered an injunction on logging before. It is also a groundbreaking case because it is the first time that the Supreme Court has been asked to order a party in a public interest case to pay security of this type".
"The judgment says 'this is an exceptional case', and that if logging was allowed to go ahead before the trial, there is 'a genuine risk' that the Potoroo habitat may be destroyed", said Ms Redwood.
Justice Forrest said that the relevant laws "demonstrate the clear legislative intent that protecting threatened or endangered species such as the Potoroo is particularly important".
"We feel vindicated by this decision today and look forward to having the case heard for the protection of the forests and rare wildlife on Brown Mountain", said Ms Redwood.
For comment: Jill Redwood ph (03) 5154 0145
The Federal by-election in the Victorian seat of Gippsland will be held on June 28th.
The Speaker for the Federal House of Representatives, Harry Jenkins will issue a writ on May the 19th. It will be a 40-day campaign.
Both the Liberals and Nationals have held official campaign launches, but the ALP has been waiting for the date of the by-election to be announced.
The Former National Party MP, Peter McGauran, announced his resignation from the seat in early April to take up a job in the racing industry.
There has already been controversy in the Labor Party's preselection process when Labor head office stepped in to announce a candidate against the wishes of local branches.
The seat is a critical one for the Nationals.
They have held the seat with the Country Party since the 1920's and the last three-cornered contest was in 1983.
Last month Federal Liberal MPs tried to convince the State independent to run on a joint party ticket.
The date of the election has caused concern in some quarters, because it is the first week of the Victorian school holidays.
Environment and community groups are calling for a halt on plans to significantly expand the Port of Hastings due to the unacceptable risks they pose to Westernport Bay's environmental and recreational values.
"Westernport has remarkable environmental and recreational values right on Melbourne's doorstep," said the Victorian National Parks Association's Marine and Coastal Project Officer Simon Branigan.
"Extensive tracts of seagrass, mangrove and saltmarsh habitats provide nurseries for fish species and important foraging, breeding and roosting habitat for shorebirds and wader birds," he said.
Blue Wedges Coalition spokesperson Jenny Warfe warned the plans could undermine the bay's resilience to climate change.
"Plans to expand the Port of Hastings endanger Westernport's values and reduce the resilience of the bay to the ongoing impacts of climate change," she said.
Download joint community & enviroment groups statment here
"The current port expansion plans include major new and upgraded road and rail transport corridors, significant dredging of the channel, the decimation of 4-6 kilometres of mangroves, and substantial land reclamation.i
"The State Government's plans to export 12 million tonnes of brown coal through Hastings by 2020ii will add further to traffic and pollution, massively increase shipping traffic, and will heighten the risk of contaminant spills including oil in an area known to be extremely vulnerable to spills," she said.
The Westernport and Peninsula Protection Council's Karri Giles said the expansion plans could ruin the bay's credentials as a tourist drawcard.
"We also want to stand up for the recreational values of Westernport - swimming, fishing, education, tourism - as well as its environmental values," said Ms Giles.
"Port expansion could tip the balance in Westernport and ruin the very reason why people visit the bay."
"The joint statement by fifteen groups demonstrates considerable support for an urgent and comprehensive assessment of Westernport's values and threats to better inform planning and protection measures - not an ill-conceived port expansion," said Simon Branigan.
The groups call on the Brumby Government and Baillieu Coalition Opposition to commit to:
i Port of Hastings Corporation (2009) Port of Hastings Land Use & Transport Strategy. ii Morton, A (2010) State brown coal export plan revealed, The Age, November 4.
For comment
The Otway Conservation Council (OCC) is asking the Environment Minister Gavin Jennings to intervene to protect an area of forest that is currently being logged in the Wait-A-While Creek catchment, which is habitat for Yellow-bellied Gliders and Powerful Owls.
Stephen Chenery spokesperson for Otway Conservation Council, said "We have spoken with the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) which okayed the logging in such a highly sensitive habitat area, but they have said they will not halt the logging. They had agreed to conduct an inspection of the coup with us, but have now reneged on the undertaking. We have now contacted the Premier John Brumby and the Minister for Environment Gavin Jennings and expect their reply early next week"
Logging in this area has also been opposed by the local landcare group, and landholders. "This area is of national park status because of it’s biodiversity values and should be added to the Great Otway National Park." said Mr Chenery,
"The area being logged contains many Yellow-bellied Glider feed trees which are at risk of damage from logging operations. All vegetation around them is being cleared which will expose them to wind damage thereby reducing the habitat value for both the yellow-bellied glider and the Powerful Owl. One habitat tree has already been felled." said Mr Chenery.
THE six candidates in the Deakin Ward by-election for the City of Greater Geelong have announced their preferences ahead of the postal vote.
On paper, the six candidates appear to have paired off, with each trading second preferences with one other candidate.
Highton businessman Andrew Katos has given his second preferences to Highton mother Trish McClure, who in turn has given her second preferences to Mr Katos.
Similarly, Geelong Greens convener Bruce Lindsay and unionist Andy Richards have traded second preferences, and Barwon Health finance manager Brandon Howard has traded preferences with public servant Ron Nelson.
The six hopefuls have also provided the state electoral commission with their candidate statements, which have been published on the commission's website.
Mr Howard yesterday announced he had launched his own website at www.brandonhoward. com.au.
He said the website would allow residents to communicate with him on the important issues.
"I am committed to listening to the issues that affect the residents of Deakin Ward and this is why I have set up this website," Mr Howard said.
"A councillor's role is more than just looking after garbage and gutters but it's about listening to the real issues of our community, so that we can work together to find solutions."
Mr Katos went on the front foot yesterday on the issue of water.
He said Geelong's council should work with other local councils to probe the opportunities to secure our region's future water supply needs.
"Many residents are fearful that new housing developments will result in an unsustainable drain on the region's water supply leaving Geelong in a permanent state of drought and water restrictions," Mr Katos said.
"It beggars belief that Geelong is continually beset with water restrictions when our city is surrounded by water, has the Barwon River flowing through it and the high rainfall Otways situated in our back yard."
Ballot packs containing voting material will be posted to voters from Tuesday, April 15.
Ballot papers must be received by the returning officer by 6pm on Friday, May 2.
More than 20 representatives from Dandenongs environment groups questioned the minister on a range of green topics at Olinda Community House.
Greens candidate for Monbulk Jo Tenner, representing the Upper Yarra and Dandenongs Environment Council, likened the fight against weeds to tackling a cancer.
“You don’t say that you’ve cured three to five per cent of the cancer and stop the treatment,” she said.
“You actually have to take the steps, make the investment to treat 100 per cent of the cancer, then you can go on a maintenance regime.”
“But we seem to be in a situation where year after year we get drip fed, which really just doesn’t tackle the problem.”
Mr Jennings accepted an invitation from Ms Tenner to return to the region in spring to see the problem first-hand.
The 10/30 rule, which allows hills homeowners to remove vegetation within 30 metres of their house and trees within 10 metres, also came under fire.
Olinda Action Group’s Mark Ferguson asked Mr Jennings when and how these vegetation controls would be reassessed.
“At the time we were told very clearly when the rules were announced that it was going to be a trial,” he said. Mr Ferguson said many people were removing trees to improve their view rather than for fire safety, and the rule was likely to have a major effect on the Dandenongs.
Southern Dandenongs Landcare Group’s Anne Elizabeth said trees were being taken for granted.
“The 10/30 rule, in my opinion, devalues people’s perceptions of the Australian bush.”
Mr Jennings said many people had “heartfelt anxieties” about bushfire which he had to be respectful of in dealing with the 10/30 rule, but agreed a review was needed.
“We should measure its effectiveness and its appropriateness,” he said.
By Casey Neill, Ranges Trader Mail 4th May 2010
Click on the media release to read the full text
Greens candidate for Gippsland Dr Malcolm McKelvie has said the first Rudd / Swan Budget fails miserably to meet the urgent challenge of climate change.
"Labor is spending $44 on defence to every $1 to tackle climate change. Yet this is the most urgent issue facing Gippsland, Australia and the globe."
"Rudd and Swan have offered $1 to climate change to every $28 to fossil fuel subsidies. The farce they call ‘clean coal’ is being given $2 to every $1 for renewables research. On top of that the funds to run the Department of Environment have been cut by $50 million from last year.
"Instead of throwing valuable tax-payers money to a distant fantasy of being able to burn coal cleanly, it should urgently put that money into getting a large scale renewable industry going in the Latrobe valley. This would also ensure secure employment in the growing sector of the industry while helping to clean up the valley’s brown air and health problems. With the urgent need to tackle climate change, it is inevitable that the coal industry must be phased out. But why have successive governments been unable to deal with the fossil fuel industry? The answer could be that it is a major lobby group with plenty of money.
Further information: Dr Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
Yarra Ranges councillor to stand in State Election

Greens candidate Malcolm McKelvie slammed the recent Brumby government announcement of the Strzelecki deal, as a mix of spin, hypocrisy and fraud.
The Greens have condemned the ALP for dressing up another tax rort for plantations as climate policy.
"This law gives investors an up-front 100% tax deduction on their costs in establishing a plantation with no requirement that the trees be kept in the ground.
The Greens, Nationals and Senator Heffernan joined forces to condemn the bill.
"Why is the ALP determined to drive regional Australia off the land and undermine the viability of their communities with this latest tax gift to plantation growers?" said Dr Mckelvie.
"It is utterly wrong to describe what is a Managed Investment Scheme for tree growers on steroids as a carbon sink scheme.
"There is nothing to stop a company declaring its intention to establish a carbon sink forest, claiming the tax deduction for their establishment costs, and then selling the land to allow the trees to be cut down. This Bill might even the give tax deductions enough to cover the cost of purchasing land for the plantations.
"This law will not result in native vegetation being established in marginal areas, as marginal land does not produce healthy, fast-growing forests.
"These trees will be established on prime agricultural land, buying up water rights, sucking catchments dry and driving more families off the land.
"This tax rort will not produce the intended long term carbon sinks and must be fixed"
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
Greens candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie called for Esso to do more to stop the Gippsland coastline subsiding along the 90 Mile Beach at a public meeting in Yarram yesterday.
"Esso is pumping out enough oil and gas from the Latrobe Aquifer offshore from the Ninety Mile Beach to fill the Sugarloaf Reservoir each year, but they are not putting seawater back. The incredible coastline along the Ninety Mile Beach is at risk, along with the tourists who flock to experience it each year," Dr McKelvie said.
"Over the next 50 years the coastline is predicted to drop by as much as 2 meters because of Esso's activities. There is also a substantial predicted sea level rise because of climate change" he said.
"We must act now to save our vulnerable coastal environments, and the coastal tourist communities who depend on them" Dr McKelvie said.
"Senate Estimates reveal that much of the crucial research and extension work currently being carried out by LWA will not be taken over by other agencies," said Senator Rachel Siewert.
"I cannot believe how short-sighted this government is when it comes to securing the future of our agriculture and managing our natural resources."
Belinda Coates will stand as a candidate for the Central Ward in the pending Ballarat City Council election in November.
Belinda previously stood as Greens candidate for Ballarat West in the 2006 state election and for the federal seat of Ballarat in the 2007 election. She will stand as endorsed Greens candidate for the Council election in November. Belinda has always lived in Ballarat and has worked locally as a social worker for the past 15 years.
“Local government is an obvious place to influence decisions that enhance community well-being, build a sense of community and make a contribution to addressing climate change. Many other local governments across Victoria are miles ahead of Ballarat and have made significant changes to reduce their environmental footprint”
“There are unlimited possibilities to promote Ballarat as a leader in this regard and build on the current Ballarat Council Environment Sustainability Plan. More emphasis on storm water capture for use in local businesses, parks and gardens is an obvious area for improvement. Promotion of local food and produce and investment in local businesses is another area that would be good for the community and reduce Ballarat’s environmental impact.
” Belinda is taking action in her own life to reduce her carbon footprint. She has retrofitted her home to be energy efficient, has solar hot water (evacuated tubes) and just recently had a one kilowatt photovoltaic solar energy system installed. Belinda has a water tank and kitchen garden. She walks or rides to work and uses public transport for other travel.
For media enquiries, please contact: Belinda Coates on 0400 947 688
Belinda will be available between 12-1pm today for a photo at her energy efficient home.
Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown will be campaigning in Gippsland tomorrow with Greens candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie.
Senator Brown and Dr McKelvie will hold a press conference tomorrow morning at 12.30pm to discuss the Greens’ policy to reduce power bills and greenhouse gas emissions by retrofitting houses for energy efficiency and the Greens’ policy to increase aged pensions by $30 a week, which has been adopted by the Liberal candidate.
12.30pm – Press conference with Senator Bob Brown, Australian Greens Leader and Dr Malcolm McKelvie, Greens candidate for Gippsland
Post Office Place Park 161-169 Franklin St, Traralgon
1pm – Senator Brown and Dr McKelvie will have lunch at the Cargo Lounge Cafe Bar Photographers welcome.
Further information: Ebony Bennett 0409 164 603
Michael Bond Greens candidate for Gippsland , said, “The Greens welcome the Brumby Governments announcement of a staged closure of Hazelwood power station. However it raises questions about what will replace it because previous governments have all failed to set Australia on a sustainable course with regard to Climate Change,”
“The Australian Greens offered amendments to the ALP’s ETS that would have locked in success, not failure. Instead, now it is likely that public funds may be used to compensate power generation companies for shutting down turbines at Hazelwood or just keep them rolling, churning more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.”
“We don’t have the mechanisms in place such as a price on carbon and feed- in tariffs that would allow existing high tech energy solutions into the market place. We need these to make the required deep cuts in carbon emissions and allow us to move away from dependence on fossil fuels to generate energy,” he said.
“Without a price on carbon there is no above-board and fail-safe means of stemming the tide of Australian high tech energy solutions leaving the country for overseas markets, where governments aren’t dominated by fossil fuel lobby groups. We need these high tech energy solutions to ensure future employment for our excellent workforce here in Gippsland.“
“The world is moving to a low carbon future, if we don’t grasp the opportunities and position ourselves at the forefront of development we will be left behind and be forced to import technology that is leaving our shores now as intellectual property,” he added. “Australia needs the Greens ‘New Deal’, a road map that will secure a profitable future for Australia.”
contact Michael Bond 0413 315 084 michael.bond@vic.greens.org.au
Co-ordination of buses so that they connect with trains is a simple and low cost initiative that represents a missed opportunity in last weeks State Budget that would have greatly improved the quality of local public transport services.
“And there is ample room for improvement” said Jo Tenner Greens Candidate for Monbulk, as detailed In a study released this week by The Public Transport Users Association analysing bus-train connections.http://www.ptua.org.au/2010/05/09/train-bus-connections/
“The Monbulk Electorate came up pretty poorly in this study. For example if we look at the results for the train connections to the Belgrave – Lilydale bus route (663) we see that on average only a third of the trains connect with this bus and of those half exceed what is defined as a good waiting period of 10 minutes. And other routes had worse results.”
“Crowded car parks at train stations is a concern that has been raised with me by many people in the Monbulk Electorate, some would like to the option of catching the bus but feel that it is unreliable or that they are kept waiting too long.”
“Of course, the overall lack of bus services is a significant factor, say on a Sunday when there is no bus – you can’t even begin to talk about timely connections, and with the underwhelming results of the local bus services review announced a little while ago coupled with no new funding announced in the State Budget for new bus services, its going to be a long wait for the bus.”
The investigation has resulted in two councillors facing charges for failing to declare interests.
“Greens on Ballarat City Council will work for a clean environment and clean politics,” said Jon Stanger. “Our only interest will be the community.”
“The losers in all this have been the Ballarat community,” said JonStanger. “We need fresh faces on Council, people who are there for the community first, not for themselves, their mates or the big end of town.”
“As a Greens candidate for Council, I offer third party insurance,” said Jon Stanger. “I will work cooperatively with anyone on Council but also act as a watchdog.”
“We have candidates for Council from both Labor and Liberal parties, all calling themselves independent, but what this investigation shows is that nobody is truly independent; we all have interests,” said Jon Stanger. “What is needed is a watchdog to ensure the interests of the community are put first.”
“It's time for a more open Council that acts with honesty andintegrity.”
“We need fresh faces to bring a new commitment to transparency.”
For more information and comment, please contact:Jon Stanger on 0415 755 181
The Community Benefit Statements allow pokies venues to receive a taxbreak on their gambling revenue. Venues are required to show that atleast 8.5 percent of their gaming machine revenue is spent on approvedcommunity purposes or activities.
To claim an expense on a Community Benefit Statement, it must have beenpaid from gaming machine revenue, not general revenue. The CommunityBenefit Statement of the North Ballarat Football Club shows a $10,000'Council oval maintenance levy' and $21,281 of 'Water and Council Rates'came from pokies revenue. *
“Pokies and problem gambling do enormous harm to the community”, saidJon Stanger. “Council should not be benefiting from pokies revenue.”
“We are talking about standard operating expenses with no communitybenefit,” said Jon Stanger. “While it is the State Government thatallows venues to make a mockery of Community Benefit Statements, Councilshould be deeply concerned about this.”
“Council should make a clear stand and insist that pokies venues do notpay rates or levies out of pokies revenue and claim them as a communitybenefit.”
For more information and comment, please contact:Jon Stanger on 0415 755 181
Background:
Source: Victorian Commission for Gambling Regulationhttp://www.vcgr.vic.gov.au
“I’m afraid its more of the same, business as usual, despite the terrible state of Victoria’s northern rivers, and increased threats from climate change” said Louis Delacretaz, Convenor of the Country Greens Victoria Network at their Annual General Meeting on Sunday 7th December at Mooroolbark Community Centre.
Samantha Dunn maintains a regular blog at http://samantha-dunn@blogspot.com
We would like to express our deepest sympathy and support to all those communities affected by the terrible wildfires. Words cannot describe the devastating losses that have occurred over the weekend under the worst fire conditions Victoria has ever experienced.
Many Country Greens, friends and supporters have suffered or are still fighting fires.
Our thoughts and prayers are with you and the communities still under threat.
A huge thanks to all the volunteers, CFA, emergency workers and everyone who has worked so hard endeavoring to protect our communities. The bravery and dedication of our firefighters has been enormous and is ongoing.
Victorian communities have responded with a magnificent compassionate outpouring of support, funds, goods and assistance.
We encourage everyone to offer assistance where they can, to donate money to Victoria Bushfire relief fund www.redcross.org.au or 1800 811 700, to consider giving blood (131 495) in a few weeks as the supply is good at the moment.
Clothes, blankets or furniture can be donated to your nearest Salvation Army or other charity collection point.
To donate accommodation contact the Victorian Bushfire Public Accommodation Donation Line on 1800 006 468. 8am - 8pm.
To volunteer time and skills call Go Volunteer on 1300 366 356 or www.volunteeringaustralia.org/volunteer To offer horse agistment contact Triple R Equine Welfare Crisis Network on 0431 674 114 or http://triplerequinewelfare.org
To donate fodder contact the Victorian Farmers Federation on 1300 882 833 or www.vff.org.au
To help accomodate small animals contact Animal Aid http://www.animalaid.com.au,
To help with wildlife rescue contact Wildlife Rescuers http://www.wildliferescuers.org.au/index.html
Wendy Radford Louis Delacretaz
Country Greens Victoria Network
“Figures just released to parliament revealing that in excess of $570 million will be paid annually to the consortium building the Wonthaggi desalination plant, regardless of how much water it delivers”, said Neil Rankine, Greens candidate for Bass, “show that the State Government was incompetent in ordering such a large plant.
“AquaSure the international consortium building the plant and the banks, Westpac and NAB, that set up the financing on the other hand have clearly secured a great set of contracts for themselves.
“Premier Bracks said the plant would be run constantly at full capacity when he announced it in 2007. They have been back-pedalling ever since. The excessive scale of the desalination plant was confirmed by studies I was involved in more than two years ago and again by DSE studies for the Environmental Effects Statement required for the desal plant.
“I met with AquaSure and the banks’ representatives in October last year after the signing of contracts. I asked them how they could possibly recoup their investment and make a profit on the project at the $3.5 billion cost then being given by the government, when only a fraction of the plant’s capacity was likely to be ordered in any year. The response involved the lifting of an eyebrow and the simple statement, ‘we’re pretty sure that we will be adequately compensated’.
“There is no doubt that Melbourne’s water supply needed augmentation after fifteen years of failing to foresee the impacts of population growth and climate change. The state government did start to develop a plan in 2002. To turn that promise, of a sustainable water policy, on its head, just after the last election shows gross disregard for what people will be paying, and for the lost opportunities the sustainable plan would have delivered.
“Melbournians will be the ones paying this minimum $570 million for the excessively large desalination plant, that’s of the order of $400 per household per year. If we assume the desal plant might operate at one third capacity on average, that would mean that this fee alone would give a current cost of water from the desal plant at $11.40 per cubic metre, wholesale (where the government has been spinning a $1.37 figure of late). Referring to Melbourne Water’s annual report, that is more than twenty times what it currently costs them to source our water (excluding the North-South Pipe & Desalination Plant).
“We have a government in Victoria more interested in mega projects to make themselves look progressive, rather than one interested in what is being extracted from our pockets and the environmental implications of these unsustainable projects”, says Neil Rankine, the Greens candidate for the state seat of Bass where the desalination plant is being constructed.
Contact: Neil Rankine, AGV candidate for Bass 0413 902571 neil.rankine@vic.greens.org.au
Greens candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie is calling for sanity after a new coal production plant for the Latrobe valley was announced yesterday.
"This is a completely crazy idea," Dr McKelvie said “we are trying to reduce carbon pollution, not increase it.”
“Putting pollution down holes in the ground is unproven and the technology is still years away. This project is set to burn more power, make more pollution and help heat the climate starting next year and expects to pay no carbon tax
Greens candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie has accused the Labor government of following the coalition policy of underspending on dental care. The Greens recognise dental care as part and parcel of good health and would establish “denticare”, a publicly funded dental health scheme for all Australians.
“The coalition abandoned dental care in Australia and now Labor has done close to the same thing. They have announced new dental programs worth $781 million but at the same time scrapped a $491 million program”.
“People with chronic dental problems suffer poor health through poor nutrition, chronic infection, poor social interaction and fewer employment opportunities” said Dr Malcolm McKelvie. “Those worst affected are typically from lower socio-economic backgrounds. Denying people access to basic preventive and treatment services is unfair and further exacerbates the rich-poor divide.
“The Latrobe Community Dental Health Service is currently seeing people who were put on the waiting list in September 2005. We need a comprehensive approach to prevention of all health problems including tooth decay”.
“The Greens in Federal Parliament have this week put up a successful motion for the Rudd Government to start work on international legal action against whaling in our waters” said Greens candidate, Dr Malcolm McKelvie.
"We don’t have whales in Traralgon or Orbost but it is an issue which Australians everywhere feel very strongly about.
“Those who want the government to take action account for 87% of voters. The Howard/Coalition Government looked the other way as our whaling sanctuary ran red with blood. The Rudd government is making the right noises but is yet to take effective action.
“This is an example of the big issues the Greens are spearheading in Federal Parliament. From illegal whaling to genetic engineering and dying with dignity. Being a local representative is not just about ‘parish pump’ issues.”
The Greens are questioning the 'clean green Gippsland' claims after reports this week shows the Gippsland Lakes are almost damaged beyond repair.
"If we can measure the health of our agriculture by the health of the Gippsland lakes, then we are probably not very clean or green at all," said Dr Malcolm McKelvie, Greens candidate for the Gippsland by-election.
"We can all see that the Gippsland Lakes are in the throes of totalecosystem collapse at the moment. All marine life is dying and even thewater rats are starving as the bottom end of the food chain collapses,"said Dr McKelvie. "The problem is bigger than just the blight of thepermanent algal bloom."
"The scientific report just published by Dr Peter Fisher points to cause being nutrient, sediment and toxics loads from agriculture and industrial processes throughout the whole Gippsland catchment", said Dr McKelvie.
"The report says that the cause of the lakes death is from many sources over the last couple of decades. It is in pesticide runoff from potates grown in Thorpedale, mercury from APM at Maryvale, penicillin given to dairy cows for mastitis, and the manure from 100,000 cows in thecatchment. As well last years fires and floods did not help the lakes plight."
"The government needs to take a leadership role in rescuing the Gippsland Lakes. We need a long term solutions and Federal assistance to help our communities change their work practices. There are some simple actions like changing how we handle dairy waste that can reduce the pressure on the lakes”
"Words are no longer enough. We have had more than 10 years of reports predicting the collapse of the lakes. Now it is really happening, the Federal Government needs to stop ignoring Gippsland and help us clean up the lakes."
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615 Greens Candidate for Gippsland By Election 2008www.cgn.org.au/Malcolm_McKelvie gippsland@greens.org.au
The Australian Greens today expressed concerns over the impact the Federal Government’s recent proposal, Caring for Our Country will have to the Gippsland Landcare network. In Melbourne today, Senator Rachel Siewert said changes to funding for land management programs could have the potential to undermine local initiatives.
“The Greens believe there is a need for an over-arching, science based approach to natural resource management and conservation. The effect of Minister Garrett’s plans on funding will be to spread the vegemite even thinner,” said Senator Siewert.
Gippsland families could be paying for the water used by large industries in the Latrobe Valley. Greens candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie has warned that Gippsland residents should look carefully at the commercial arrangements for the Gippsland Water Factory
"I applaud the strategy of treating and recycling waste water but the cost shifting to ordinary familes is outrageous" said Dr McKelvie. "Seventy percent of the water being treated comes from Australian Paper and they will be one of the biggest consumers of the recycled water but their water rates at set to remain the same over the next 5 years.
"The final cost of the plant will be around $200 million, of which the State has contributed $50 million. This leaves $150 million to be payed for by the other customers of Gippsland Water" said Dr McKelvie, "That means a 100% increase in water rates over the next 5 yrs for Gippsland families" .
"To add insult to injury Gippslanders should note that the Federal government recently gave the Ballarat region $150 million for water infrastructure but have not contributed a cent to this project.
"Who is standing up for Gippsland on this issue? Not the old political parties!
"This is one more example of the old political parties showing blatant favouritism towards their big corporate mates, hoping "working families" don't notice."
For comments Dr Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615 Greens Candidate for Gippsland By – Electionwww.cgn.org.au/Malcolm_McKelvie gippsland@greens.org.au
Recent studies have shown that protecting native forests will be critical to offset the burning of coal. The Greens candidate for Gippsland, Dr Malcolm McKelvie has asked all candidates and voters to think about Gippsland's two big industries that are worsening climate change.
"Gippsland has one of Australia's biggest coal mining industries and we are also woodchipping our native forests at record rates. Put the two together and it's a climate change nightmare." said Dr McKelvie. "This is why Gippsland's forests must be used as ready-to-go offsets to counter the greenhouse gas output of the coal industry.
"Renewables must be the future for power supply in Victoria and while the shift takes place, our forests are essential as carbon offsets to hold and keep absorbing more CO2. We can't have both coal burning and forest burning any longer if we are to seriously tackle climate change.
Research by Professor David Lindenmayer at the ANU has shown that typical SE Australian wet forests, which cover large parts of Gippsland, store a massive 2,000 tonnes of carbon (above ground) per hectare. This means Victoria's wet forests could be worth at the very least $80 BILLION just standing there growing.
"By protecting forests as rich and valuable carbon stores, they are also providing many other services; they are water and air purifiers, rain makers, soil builders and wildlife reservoirs. They don't need hi-tech equipment, research delays or millions of dollars to build them. They are ready to start work right now, countering climate change and earning us money. All that's needed is clear thinking from governments and a strong will to tackle climate threats.
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615 Greens Candidate for Gippsland By – Election 2008www.cgn.org.au/Malcolm_McKelvie gippsland@greens.org.au
|
Along with more than 70 Greens local government candidates across the state, Ballarat City Council candidates Belinda Coates and Jon Stanger have pledged to act now on climate change if elected to council.
Talking amidst a 'Art for Environment' day at the Sturt Street rotunda, Central Ward candidate Belinda Coates said "State and Federal Governments are not taking the science seriously - it's time for local governments to lead."
Signing the Climate Pledge, Ms Coates said that if elected to council she would do her utmost to:
“I want the council to govern for now and for the future and assist the community and local business to adjust,” said Ms Coates. “There are economic and social benefits to be had from acting early on climate change.”
For more information and comment, please contact: Belinda Coates on 0400 947 688 Jon Stanger on 0415 755 181
|
Multi-million cost of carbon pollution from logging in East Gippslandand Southeast forests, Greens MPs send invoice to Eden Chipmill
Following a visit yesterday to Eden Chipmill Greens MPs from Victoria,NSW and ACT have forwarded to the mill's general manager an invoice forthe estimated cost of the carbon pollution generated as a result of2006/7 logging.
Greens MPs Sue Pennicuik (Victoria), Lee Rhiannon (NSW) and Deb Foskey(ACT) toured the Eden Chipmill today with Peter Mitchell, GeneralManager, and Peter Rutherford, Forestry Manager, with South East FibreExports Pty Ltd.
"Our visit today to the Eden Chipmill was informative and weappreciated the briefing we were given by the SEFE management team.However, the challenge of climate change has thrown up more reasons whyour magnificent native forests in East Gippsland and southeast NSWshould be protected and logging discontinued," Ms Pennicuik said.
"To highlight the damaging impact this chipmill operation is having onthe global as well as the local environment today we have sent aninvoice to Mr Mitchell for the estimated cost of the carbon pollutiongenerated by logging linked to the Eden Chipmill.
"The invoice for $181 million has been determined using the latestdata on the amount of carbon dioxide released by logging based on anestimated $10 per tonne cost for carbon dioxide under an EmissionsTrading Scheme.
"The $10 per tonne figure is conservative. Using Sir Nicholas Stern$107 per tonne of carbon dioxide figure set out in his report to theBritish government this invoice would rise to $1.9 billion.
Greens MP Lee Rhiannon said, "One of the most significant actions wecan take to cut Australia's greenhouse gas emissions is to stop nativeforest logging.
"A climate change priority for the NSW and federal governments is toclose down the Eden Chipmill and develop a restructuring package thatinvolves retraining and jobs for the 70 chipmill workers.
"Our precious forests are of far greater value to the world as acarbon bank than as a shipload of woodchips heading to Japan.
Greens MP Deb Foskey said "I will be working closely with my NSW andVictorian colleagues on this campaign to expose the threats posed byforestry destruction and woodchipping to climate change.
"Native forests should not be felled for woodchips, electricitygeneration or to drive the profits of overseas companies. The richsoutheast biodiversity must be protected.
"Closure of the chipmill will be a win for the environment and theeconomy, as the pollution cost burden will be removed.
Copies of the invoice and letter to Mr Mitchell available on request.
For more information - Sue Pennicuik 0407 000 270,
Lee Rhiannon - 0427 861 568,
Deb Foskey - 0413 223 585
Senator Christine Milne visited Ballarat and talked to local Greens candidates for Ballarat City Council, Belinda Coates and Jon Stanger, about local solutions to climate change. For more information and comment, please contact: Belinda Coates on 0400 947 688
The Greens are asking all candidates in the Gippsland by-election to pledge support to cleaning up the corrupting influence that political donations have in Australia by reforming our electoral laws.
“The recent scandal regarding developers’ bribes dressed up as donations to the NSW government is just the latest example,” said Malcolm McKelvie, Greens candidate for Gippsland. "We don't want these influences in Gippsland."
"The Greens welcome the Federal Government’s plan to ban overseas political donations and limit hidden donations to $1000. But this does not go far enough – to be fully accountable and tackle corruption, there’s much more to be done.
"The Greens have been campaigning on this issue for decades. We understand how large donations can corrupt our democracy and make a mockery of the voting system.
“Not only do we need to reduce the limit on undeclared donations, but the public must know who is behind larger donations, especially those from entities that are fronts for hidden interests such as lobby groups, large industries and developers.
"Recording donations on a public register is essential, but only part of the reform that’s needed. Donations clearly buy influence and favours – why else would anyone give thousands of dollars to political parties?
"In NSW $9.9 million in donations have flowed to the state ALP in the past five years from property developers. The Greens want to ensure there are clear and unambiguous commitments from all Gippsland candidates to help make our local democracy accountable and protected from vested interests.
"When unpopular developments are pushed through such as the Wonthaggi desalination plant, the gas plant on the Snowy, the Bastion Point boat-ramp at Mallacoota, as well as highly favoured and protected industries like woodchipping, we have to wonder if there are any financial influences at work.
For further information: Malcom McKelvie 0417 364 615 Greens Candidate for Gippsland By - Election
Greens candidate for Narracan, Belinda Rogers, expressed her support for the State Election campaign by Domestic Violence Victoria today.
Federal funding cut to Gippsland wide community run Multicultural Service of grave concern to Australian Greens.
Gippsland Multicultural Services has lost it’s “settlement funding” to other agencies despite 25 years of experience. Workers and Volunteers at the Multicultural Centre provided a service for newly arrived refugees and migrants who were on permanent visas.
Australian Greens candidate for Gippsland, Michael Bond said that it “was of great concern that the ALP have disregarded all these years of community service and knowledge, and that it appears to be another streamlining action of the ALP with little regard for the community connections that have been established by the organization”.
“The Immigration & Refugee Policy of the Australian Greens is the most comprehensive of all the parties and supports the work the Gippsland Multicultural Service did in providing adequate, effective and timely support to refugees and migrants on permanent visas”, said Michael Bond.
“The Australian Greens would work to ensure that funding for public and community sector agencies providing these migrant-specific services is increased to a level sufficient for the Gippsland Multicultural Service to work, and continue to work, in the interests of refugees and migrants”.
“The Australian Greens policy on Multiculturalism recognizes the importance of the work done by this organization in providing services, promoting belonging and connection, and providing data that will help improve the services and programs”, said Michael Bond, "Sadly all this work seems to have been ignored by the Federal Government", he concluded.
Jon Stanger is a resident and ratepayer in Ballarat and a localdisability support worker. He wants to see Ballarat become a transitiontown to tackle the water crisis, climate change and peak oil.
“The water crisis and rising fuel, food and energy costs will hit ushard if we're not prepared”, said Jon Stanger. “Leading the way bytackling these issues and becoming a transition town will reduce thecost and impact of water shortages, climate change and peak oil.”
“There has never been a more important time to have Greens in localgovernment. State and Federal Governments are failing on water and thetransition away from fossil fuels, we must take action at the locallevel.”
The new ward boundaries in Ballarat mean three Councillors will beelected in Central Ward. The Greens second candidate, Jon Stangerbelieves Ballarat is very vulnerable to the triple threat of watershortages, climate change and peak oil.
“The transition town solution means acting now to avoid problems in thefuture,” said Jon Stanger. “A transition town produces food locally,builds efficient houses, makes better use of water, supports localbusiness, uses renewable energy and builds community.”
“Ballarat will be a more liveable city as a transition town: betterconnected, lower bills, more independence, cleaner streets and a stronglocal economy.”
“The water is running out, oil will be next and the climate is changing.Yet we are still building houses that increase the demand on our waterstorages, rely on power from dirty coal and have no viable alternativeto the car for transport.”
“Make the transition, vote Green for Ballarat in November.”
For more information and comment, please contact:Jon Stanger on 0415 755 181
Greens candidate Malcolm McKelvie is challenging the other by-election candidates to compare energy use in their campaign offices. He has offered a free audit by a professional energy assessor and is keen to help them reduce their energy use during this campaign..jpg)
“There's more than one type of hot air which political candidates produce but let's look at greenhouse gasses this month" said Malcolm McKelvie
Australia and the world urgently needs to move to a low carbon economy and eventually to a zero carbon economy if we have any hope to avoid catastrophic effects of global warming. We all need to change the way we live and use energy, but that doesn’t mean doing without.
One vital component of the shift is being economic with the power we use. The Greens propose to introduce the Energy Efficiency Access and Savings Initiative, or EASI. It would retrofit all of Australia’s 7.4 million homes over the course of a decade, rolling out home energy audits, providing the service and paying the up-front cost, which would be recouped through savings on energy bills. EASI would require an up-front investment from the government that, at its peak, would reach $22 billion. But it would more than repay itself, not only through direct repayments but also through not having to build new power stations and electricity grid infrastructure. It would also reduce emissions and make our houses more comfortable to live in.
News that the Victoria’s Environment Minister, Gavin Jennings, has signed the Wombat Forest over to VicForests has been met with total disbelief.
“Steve Bracks promised to end all woodchipping and to hand the forest over to local community management,” commented Greens Western Victoria candidate Marcus Ward. “He said publicly and clearly, that if the community decided to end all logging that this would be respected. This pomise was made in the full glare of a state election, in writing, with the involvement and agreement of the then Treasurer John Brumby.”
“Now, in a sleazy backroom deal, it’s all out the window. It’s a total betrayal. One wonders what it takes to get the ALP to honour its commitments,” said Mr Ward.
“If they think the Wombat community is going to roll over and play dead, I think they’ve grossly misjudged us. I fought for over ten years to stop the logging as did hundreds of others. We’re still here.”
“The Minister should rethink and start acting like an environment minister for a change,” Mr Ward said. “Local and state conservation groups have recently put a plan to declare the Wombat a conservation reserve. Is this the Minister’s formal response?”
“My feeling is that VicForests will not get a single stick out of the Wombat Forest. If it’s back to the barricades, then so be it.”
“Whatever happens, the government’s credibility has been permanently damaged.”
Marcus Ward is the Greens candidate for the Western Victoria Upper House Region. If elected he will join the three current metropolitan Greens MLCs as the first rural/regional Victorian Greens MP.
Contact: Marcus Ward on 54235254 or 0427235254
Greens MLCs have rejected a motion by the Liberals for a parliamentary inquiry into the desalination option.
"We reckon desalination is a dud and there's plenty of evidence for that. Options such as industrial reuse of water, water recycling and stormwater management all offer better, cheaper options," Mr Barber said.
"The Liberals should check out the report by the Australian Conservation Foundation, showing even an expanded water tank program could beat desalination, without all the environmental negatives," Mr Barber said.
"Even a 125 megalitre per day desalination plant would produce up to a quarter of a million tonnes of CO2 equivalent each year and we don't need that when we are trying to get Victoria's greenhouse emissions going down rather than up," Mr Barber said.
" What we need in Melbourne is to set targets for water efficiency, break them down across the various sectors of the economy and get on with implementing them. Even better would be to end logging in the mountain forests which provide our water. Young regrowth trees from clearfelling suck up heaps of water, leaving less for our rivers and dams," Mr Barber said.
"The proposal for a desalination plant in Sydney was rejected by an upper house inquiry of that State's parliament. The NSW government-appointed group chaired by Clean Up Australia founder Ian Kiernan described desalination as the "least favored and least acceptable" option for securing Sydney's water supply," Mr Barber said.
Speaking in Parliament today, Mr Barber described a desalination plant as a quick fix, high cost, high tech, magic bullet solution, with a photo opportunity. By contrast, the Greens were calling for lower risk solutions that lead to better outcomes. He described the water savings from reduced consumption as “negaliltres” rather than “megalitres”.
For further comment: Greg Barber 0433 044 771
Greens candidate for Gippsland Michael Bond has cautiously welcomed the Federal Government water announcements but is concerned that they will only result in minor increases in flows to the Snowy River.
Meeting with members of the Snowy River Alliance in Bairnsdale and Paynesville, Michael said: “The announcement to pay out the Snowy River “debt” will only result in a mere 2% increase to flows for the current water year (2010-11) when the legislated target for June 2009 was 15% below Jindabyne Dam and 21% by 2012.
“The Snowy River remains on life support. What the Snowy needs is action that will deliver major volumes of water down the river now” said Michael.
The Greens support the Snowy River Alliance's calls to (as a matter of priority): Permanently close the Mowamba Aqueduct to allow the Mowamba River to flow its natural course into the Snowy; Funding to deliver 21% of real water not paper water below Jindabyne Dam by 2012; return flows to the Upper Snowy in Kosciusko National Park below Guthega Dam and Island Bend Dam; an independent inquiry into the expenditure of the $425* million of taxpayers' money provided for Snowy River environmental flows, with a review of Australian water policy as part of that inquiry. “The Greens believe that a key part of saving the Snowy and in fact ensuring the survival of all Australian rivers is to legislate for minimum mandatory flows so successive governments cannot keep using 'the drought' as a reason to hold water back from the rivers.
“The Snowy Scheme must stay in public hands and The Greens will continue to oppose any moves for its privatisation or leasing.” (*includes $75 million for 70 Gigalitres for the Murray)
contact Michael Bond 0413 315 084 michael.bond@vic.greens.org.au
The Victorian Greens today announced their lead
Upper House candidate for Western Victoria for the 2010 Victorian State election will be Marcus Ward.
Geelong Greens Convenor, Bruce Lindsay, today announced he will run as a candidate in the Deakin Ward by-election for the City of Greater Geelong Council, on a platform of planning reform, Council activism and better governance.
Mr Lindsay said: ‘I work out at the Deakin University campus at Waurn Ponds. I feel a part of the area. This by-election is also about issues that effect Geelong and the Bellarine as a whole.’
‘Three areas of local government I want to see overhauled:
Mr Lindsay continued: ‘Poor urban design in going to have a long-term, detrimental impact on communities in Deakin Ward, especially with the proposal to put the Armstrong Creek ‘super-suburb’ on the doorstep. Even conservative estimates put increased traffic movements at 2000-10,000 more cars a day once the area is concreted and asphalted.’
‘Greater Geelong Council does not have a good record on governance and transparency – just look at the ‘cash-for-councillors’ saga. Not only does Council decision-making need to be more open – getting rid of ‘closed door’ briefings for councillors and working toward a ban on developer donations would be a good start – but we need to find ways to involve people more directly in decision-making.’
Mr Lindsay concluded: ‘Many big issues facing Geelong are outside the direct control of local government and in the hands of State or Federal Governments. For example, public transport provision is broken and needs to be overhauled.
The poker machine epidemic is rife. More than $100m lost to pokies every year in Geelong. Council is nowhere to be seen on climate change, when it should be out in front, leading local initiatives. Public opinion and action on climate change is way ahead of government action.
I want to see the Council play a grassroots campaigning role in the community. I want to see an activist Council. I have long experience as an advocate and campaigner, and I will take these skills to Council.’
Media contact: Bruce Lindsay 0439 035 277
Dr McKelvie has welcomed Darren Chester's call for all candidates to support the Greens proposal for an increase in the aged pension.
"Darren's advisors seem to have forgotten that last year, Bob Brown put up two motions calling for the Federal Government to approve a $30 a week pension rise to increase their standard of living above the poverty line," said Green candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie. "The Coalition refused to approve both motions".
"Now they want us to agree with our own policy to increase the pension. We are more than happy to, and welcome Darren Chester aboard. However, we're not sure his party will join us "
"Last August The Greens also opposed any more increases in Parliamentary salaries until pensioners receive an increase. We haven't heard a squeak from the Nationals on this one either."
"For over 12 months the Greens have had the $30 a week increase as part of our policy, but we have heard nothing from the other parties in all this time. It'swonderful to note the sudden humanity that the old parties display in the runup to an election.
"After eight weeks of the Gippsland by-election campaign its great that theNationals are finally hearing aged pensioners. Now they just have to listen to the community concerns on climate change, GE foods and forests.
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615 Greens Candidate for Gippsland By Election 2008
If Darren Chester is elected at this weekend's by-election poll, the Greens will hold him to the commitment he made supporting cleaning up political donations.
"At the Bairnsdale Meet the Candidates meeting Darren Chester supported the Greens campaign to reform political donations" said Dr Malcolm McKelvie, Greens candidate for Gippsland.
"The Greens have campaigned for many years against corporate donations to political parties, because this is how big business influences policy", Dr McKelvie said.
"The Nationals are a case in point. Their biggest donors are slush funds, Doogary, Pilliwinks and Donations Club, designed to hide the donors and mask their influence on the party. Their three biggest named donors are Tattersalls, Tabcorp and the Australian Hotelliers Association - all big players in the gaming industry. "
"Maybe this is why Darren Chester has not taken a stand on the huge social and economic cost of electronic gaming machines. Nearly $1M in gambling revenue leaves the Latrobe Shire alone every week. That is money that is not going into local businesses, and money which many people may not be able to afford to lose."
"The Nationals have voted against reducing the number of gaming machines, in Greens bills brought in the Victorian upper house. Their commitment to their donors is greater than their commitment to reducing the harm of gambling in their electorate.
"If Darren Chester really supports cleaning up politics, maybe he should take a new broom to his own party."
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
Greens Candidate for Gippsland By Election 2008
Greens MLC Colleen Hartland has released a report that details the financial, social and environmental benefits of a 10c deposit on drink bottles, challenging the Victorian government position on the scheme.
"I commissioned this report to show that a 10c deposit system is not only good for the environment, but also makes sound financial sense. It takes the packaging industry spin, and unspins it"
"The report outlines the dollar saving for every local council and shire in Victoria – the medium to large councils would save hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Imagine what your council could do with the money saved."
"There are also savings in greenhouse gases, water and air pollution, and it would create 300-400 jobs, at a time when jobs are being lost."
"We still need to Reduce our consumption of drink containers, and learn to Reuse. But this scheme takes care of Recycle."
"I'm releasing the report to the public, and I’m going to hold a series of public meetings showing the benefits in the local area."
"We know that 94% of Victorians support container deposits in Victoria, and the recycling industry is lining up to get involved. You have to ask yourself why the Victorian government doesn't support it. I hope they change their mind."
The report can be downloaded from Colleen's website (click here).
Further comment: Colleen Hartland 9689 6373
Greens candidate, Dr Malcolm Mckelvie, is calling for a root and branch overhaul of Australia’s health system to make it fairer and more efficient. Dr McKelvie believes Gippsland is a classic example of the system being stretched to breaking point.
Greens MP, Sue Pennicuik visited the Brown Mountain area over the Australia Day
weekend and described the destruction of the old growth forest to the east of Brown Mountain Creek as 'heartbreaking'.
"I spent Sunday morning walking through one fantastic stand of old growth to the west of Brown Mountain Creek, where trees with 11 and 12 metre circumferences towered above us. They could be up to 400 years old," said Ms Pennicuik. Anyone who went there could only be awed and inspired and would want to see it protected.
"I was devastated to then visit an adjacent area that has been clear felled by Vic Forests over November and December. To see what just a few weeks ago was magnificent rainforest smashed to pieces is just terrible. It is senseless. Giant trees that have lived for hundreds of years and were home to threatened species have been just knocked to the ground in what now resembles a moonscape.
"This area is significant old growth forest of high conservation value because of the diversity of species, the age range of the trees - young, medium, and the giants that are hundreds of years old. It supports a wealth of native animals including threatened species such as the sooty owl, the greater and yellow bellied gliders and the spiny crayfish, which was spotted in the creek," she said.
During the 2006 state election the ALP pledged to protect all the remaining significant old growth forest in East Gippsland.
"It is a mistake by the government not to preserve the whole area as a vital link between the Errinundra and Snowy River National Parks. Even though one part of it has now been lost, it is not too late to prevent the destruction of any more of it," she said.
"I call on the Brumby government to take control of Vic Forests and put a stop to the planned logging in two more coupes at Brown Mountain. This area was listed as part of the National Estate in the 1980's and the values that enabled that listing are still there and are more important than ever," she said.
"This significant old growth forest is owned by the Victorian people, not by Vic Forests. It is far more valuable to the community now and in the future as carbon storage, as part of the Snowy River catchment and as an area of irreplaceable natural beauty than as a pile of woodchips heading to Japan," she said.
For further comment: Sue Pennicuik – 0409 055 875
Australian Greens candidate for Ballarat Belinda Coates says that both Labor and Liberal have simply moved to delay on climate change and it will cost the region jobs.
“In Julia Gillard's words, delay is denial and not only have both the old parties failed to deliver on climate change, we now know it will cost us 7,200 jobs in the region.”
A recent independent report commissioned by the Australian Council of Trade Unions and Australian Conservation Foundation shows that the Ballarat region would have over 32,000 new jobs created by 2030 with strong action on climate change. Just 24,700 would be created with weak action. The Ballarat region includes the local government areas of Moorabool, Ballarat, Ararat, Central Goldfields, Hepburn and Pyrenees Shire.*
“Catherine King committed to strong action on climate change at the last election, including a pledge to reduce carbon emissions 30% by 2020. It now seems our 'biggest moral challenge' can wait another three years after little action from the last three.”
“There seems to be a common theme developing where Catherine King gives the impression of caring about an issue but follows the Labor party line in the opposite direction, without saying a word publicly.”
“To make matters worse, the Liberal candidate, Mark Banwell has his head in the sand in regard to climate change. Why would he want to deny the people in the Ballarat electorate opportunities for new green jobs with strong action on climate change?”
“If you don't believe the evidence of our top scientists and every scientific body in the country, what evidence would you base any of your policies on?”
“People are tired of the same old style of politics. The Greens have a proposal for a simple carbon tax that will give business certainty and unleash new green job creation. We have a range of policies that will put a price on carbon and boost renewable energy and energy efficiency to help us reach our target of 32,000 new jobs by 2030.”
“Unions are beginning to join the million people who now vote Greens in Australia, supporting our policies on climate change and job creation. The ETU has recently announced that it has severed its ties with the Labor party and is putting its support with the Greens.”
* http://www.acfonline.org.au/articles/news.asp?news_id=2855
Contact: Belinda Coates on 0400 947 688
"The PM's decision to back down or delay again on the equitable distribution of education funding for public schools is a disgrace. It has been Labor policy for years to address the creeping of funds to non-public schools such that one third of government funds reach public schools that teach two thirds of students" said Dr Malcolm McKelvie, Greens candidate for McMillan.
"Only the Greens are now prepared to stand up for a better deal for public education. Our policy is to bolster funding for public schools and include two years of pre school education, ensuring all children have access to a great start in life and then can follow up with provision of quality education through primary and secondary schools. Tertiary education should also be publicly funded just as it was for the current crop of decision makers".
"There is no doubt that private schools do a wonderful job in education and our policy does not seek to remove all public funds from these schools, just to redress the imbalance in funding that has occurred. It is another policy area that just makes sense and is fair."
Further information: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615 malcolm.mckelvie@vic.greens.org.au
Greens candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie says Labor has halved the funding to the highly successful Australian Primary Care Collaborative program just at the time when it should have been doubled.
Not content with signing the death warrant for the solar panel industry, Labor is now callously turning its back on the pleas for help. The Federal Government should listen to the solar industry and reverse their decision to means-test the rooftop solar rebate Greens candidate for Gippsland Dr Malcolm McKelvie said today.
"Its already clear that taking away funding to help people install solar power systems was a huge mistake.” said Dr McKelvie. “If the ALP hope to start reducing the country’s greenhouse gasses, let alone have any chance of gaining voter confidence in Gippsland, it must admit its mistake and reverse the decision immediately.
"Plans to review how the solar means test impacts on people is just stalling. It is not the ‘overheating’ of the scheme they need to worry about, it’s the planet that’s overheating, it’s our weather, agriculture, water and the many climatic extremes we are seeing from too much burning of fossil fuels.”
"Besides climate impact, the other impact of the solar rebate means-test was obvious from day one. Jobs are being lost and the viability of small renewable energy businesses is seriously threatened.
”Clear thinking and some foresight would have prevented a lot of pain for people and would have also kept the number of solar installations increasing at a time when it is so essential.
"We would like to hear Darren McCubbin announce during this election on behalf of the ALP, that they will do away with means-testing the solar power rebates.
For comments Dr Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
Greens Candidate for Gippsland By – Electionwww.cgn.org.au/Malcolm_McKelvie gippsland@greens.org.au
Today the Greens have come out on the front foot over Labor’s sneaky preference deal with extremist party, Country Alliance.
In a deal that could see Country Alliance elected through Labor preferences, Greens Victorian lead Upper House candidate Samantha Dunn has expressed her anger. "This grubby deal done by the ALP with Country Alliance has all the hallmarks of the Steve Fielding deal done in 2004 that shocked and outraged so many voters," said Samantha.
"I cannot be clearer, a vote for the ALP in the Upper House is likely to lead to the election of the shooters and hunters party. Country Alliance’s vision is clear – they want less investment in renewable energy and more investment in dirty coal. Is that the future you want for you and your children?" said Samantha.
"Labor pledged to protect our forests and now they turn around and do a deal with a party that wants to destroy them. Country Alliance opposes the creation of any more National Parks and wants to continue logging in catchment areas. Labor clearly cannot be trusted. Voters in this region are smart; they will see this deal for what it is. Any credibility that Labor had with voters has disappeared."
"At the federal election the Victorian community was loud and clear on the vision they wanted when they voted in their first Greens Lower House member, Senator and record high Green vote across the region. The Victorian community said yes to the vision that supports investment in renewable energy, public transport, preventive health, climate change and making sure our forests are protected."
"Voting for the ALP this election will crush the vision that the Eastern Victorian community so clearly called for. Our community needs progressive, common sense politics, not out dated, backwards thinking, extremist policy. Think carefully about what future you want after this election. This time your vote is very powerful" Samantha concluded.
Further information: Samantha Dunn 0429 29 29 04 or samantha.dunn@vic.greens.org.au
Latrobe City ratepayers should be outraged at another level of subsidy for the coal industry that they are paying, says Greens candidate for the Gippsland by-election, Dr Malcolm McKelvie.
"When Jeff Kennett privatised the power industry he granted them a 5 year stay on paying the local government rates - the same situation that existed for SECV. For some reason this moratorium has been extended by the State Government ever since. As a result Latrobe City Council is missing out on around $10 million every year.
No prizes for guessing who makes up the shortfall- other rate payers" said Dr McKelvie.
"This is a small amount of money for these big foreign owned companies but it means an extra $100 each year for everyone else. John Brumby promised to heed the call from Latrobe City Council to reverse the decision when he was in opposition but still hasn't done so. What makes it worse is that he did gain an increase in the coal royalty payable to the State government, reaping an extra $12 million per year into the states coffers, while the Latrobe City families are paying the rates of this huge industry."
"Latrobe City ratepayers should be angry with the ALP for not honouring its promises. Once again, another example of old parties favouring big business at the expense of the ordinary family and small business."
"It seems that generous subsidies for looking at the unproven clean coaltechnology are just the latest in a string of tax payer and rate payer gifts tothe coal companies."
For comments Dr Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
Greens Candidate for Gippsland By - Election 2008www.cgn.org.au/Malcolm_McKelvie gippsland@greens.org.au
The people of the Latrobe Valley have responded to the need to change to a clean sustainable future said Greens candidate, Dr Malcolm McKelvie.
“The Greens primary vote in the Latrobe Valley has grown significantly this election while the ALP vote has fallen which shows more people are aware of the need to move away from the pollution and global warming coal industry to a better, more sustainable future in renewables and associated manufacturing.
The old major parties paid lip service to the problem of global warming and the impact that emissions trading will have on our lives” said Dr McKelvie.
“What we do in the next 2 years is crucial to our childrens’ future. We need urgent action to reduce CO2 emissions, so let’s grasp this reality as an opportunity to grow jobs in renewables, to transform transport options towards public transport and cycling or walking and improve people’s health in the process.”
“The Greens will continue to provide the vision for a peaceful, sustainable future for our children while the old parties continue with the self interested short term thinking that dominates the political scene.”
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
"What a stir the debate on marine parks is causing and what a storm in a teacup", said Dr Malcolm McKelvie, Greens candidate for McMillan.
"Even our coalition candidates won't find the concept too hard to understand- protect some sites from fishing so the fish populations can breed and thrive and spread out so there are more fish to catch everywhere else for people now as well as their children and grandchildren. It's not difficult nor very complicated- it's another policy that makes good sense and works."
"Australia is in the fortunate position that we control our fisheries and can act to protect them. Other parts of the world share fisheries with close neighbours so effective regulation and enforcement is difficult and the result is that fisheries are overused and collapse. Voters won't fall for the cheap shots taken by the coalition on this issue".
Contact Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615 malcolm.mckelvie@vic.greens.org.au
Greens candidate, Dr Malcolm McKelvie has praised Russell Broadbent for his vigorous campaign to stop genetically modified food crops getting into our food supply .
Yarragon doctor Malcolm McKelvie is the Greens candidate for the Gippsland by-election.
Dr McKelvie, who has lived in West Gippsland for 12 years, said health was a major issue that especially touched the Gippsland communities.
“As a local doctor I know there is a critical shortage of doctors and nurses throughout the region and services are stretched to the limit,” he said.
“Few GPs offer bulk billing and there are long waiting lists to see specialists and counsellors. This is an added burden in country areas, where many people are battling drought and financial hardship.
"After years of neglect by the Howard government the health service needs serious attention, but there is no indication from the Rudd Government that it has the commitment to provide this.
“The Greens will plough proposed tax cuts back in to health and education. We will also scrap the $3.6 billion federal government subsidy to private health insurance and put that money back into public health.
“We believe the health system needs the kind of root and branch overhaul that Mr Rudd has announced for the taxation system.
“That's why we propose to dismantle the current funding system and pool all state and federal funding for distribution by a health commission to end the bickering over responsibilities and control.
“We will establish a network of primary health care centres across the nation, where people can see a doctor, a nurse practitioner or a counsellor. We will also extend free dental care to those on low incomes and in special need, and build a network of 24-hour mental health centres.”
Dr McKelvie said health was just one area where the Greens stood apart from the old parties.
“The Greens want to future-proof our country in a range of areas – climate change, education, establishing renewable energy industries in places like the Latrobe Valley to tackle our reliance on fossil fuels such as coal.”
If elected to parliament, Dr McKelvie would join Prime Minister Kevin Rudd as an MP with an interest in China and its language. He has been studying Mandarin as part of his initiative to build a business importing electric-assisted bicycles from China.
For further information: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
This really seemed an impossible task as I was up against the Mayor Janet Halsall and Cr. Wayne Smith who has been here for long time.The Gippsland Greens today announced that they would not be directing preferences in this election. “None of the major parties deserve our preferences,” said Dr Malcolm McKelvie, Greens Candidate in the Gippsland By-election.
Greens candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie says there is a surprising number of issues the Greens have been fighting for over the past decade that the Nationals, ALP and Liberals are now starting to talk about. Increasing the aged pension is one example that reeks of political opportunism.
The Greens believe the topic of forest protection is a critical matter
of concern for many voters in the Gippsland region as it is so closely linked to our clean secure water supplies, carbon storage, climate stabilisation and protection of rare and threatened wildlife.
“The Labor and Coalition parties are turning a blind eye to the devastation that is being wrought in the Strzeleckis and Central Highlands”, says Michael Bond, Greens Candidate for Gippsland.
“My great Uncle, John Youl, worked for the Forest Commission in the 1920s and through the Great Depression with postings throughout Gippsland including Yarram and Heyfield. He won an OBE for ‘services to the timber industry’ in 1970 and loved the forests. In those days small scale local timber-getting operators cut chosen trees only for sawlogs. Today the intensive clearfell operations of VicForests and HVP are driven by giant woodchipping interests and much of this is to supply overseas companies”, said Michael Bond “I think Uncle John would be horrified to learn what’s now happening to his beloved forests.”
“We should be developing long term secure employment such as nature tourism and looking after existing industries like honey production. These industries are being undermined as the native forest logging industry continues to devastate areas of public forest.”
“The last of our unprotected intact forests on public land in the Strzeleckis that were promised to be protected are now being chainsawed and bulldozed. The old growth forests of East Gippsland, with trees; some over 600 years old, are still on the government’s plans to be clearfelled and converted to industrial tree farms for the export woodchip industry.
"It’s just outrageous. These are carbon dense forests and should be our front-line defence against climate change and bushfires.” Michael declares.
“With climate change giving us drier and hotter summers, it is absolutely critical that our governments protect the last untouched parts of our healthy forests. These have been shown by scientists from the Australian National University (ANU) to be more fire resistant than regrowth and damaged forests.” Michael concluded.
For more details, contact Michael Bond 0413 315 084
Geelong’s approach to urban design and planning is unsustainable in the long-run and largely ad hoc, Deakin Ward candidate, Bruce Lindsay, said today. Mr Lindsay made his comments in the context of the recent release of a planning panel report into the proposed Armstrong Creek Urban Growth Plan. The Plan envisages approximately a 25% increase in the size of Geelong by mid-century. The Panel report has recommended removing from the Plan many of the ‘greener,’ more progressive elements.
Mr Lindsay said: ‘Council and Geelong communities need to look at the basic principles and models underpinning planning in the region, to move away from an uncritical "carpet" sprawl on the urban fringe. This sort of urban sprawl needs to be subject to considerable scrutiny. There is ample evidence of social and health problems associated with it, such as isolation and obesity. Then there are the adverse environmental effects, not least loss of green spaces and increased greenhouse emissions from high dependency on cars.’
‘Among other things, the Armstrong Creek proposal will put up to 24,000 more cars on local roads over coming decades.'
He continued: ‘Essentially, that is a product of the car dependency that goes hand-in-hand with this model of development. It imposes considerable cost-shifting onto families, especially with the inevitable reliance on two or more cars, and inadequate planning and delivery of services.’
‘Although the original Armstrong Creek proposal had its shortcomings, the Planning Panel’s report is a much more retrograde step. For instance, it removes ‘greenways,’ cuts the amount of proposed open space significantly, and in regard to many important services and community infrastructure just says "Oh, don’t worry, sort that out later, or just take it out." In effect, the Panel has backed the developers’ ambit claim.’
‘It is irresponsible to give the green light to development without processes for signed and sealed delivery of all relevant infrastructure and services before development starts. That means having funding and arrangements in place to make sure the public transport is going to be there, the kindergartens are going to be there, the local police station is going to be there, and the open space and biodiversity corridors are protected.’
Mr Lindsay concluded: ‘I am calling for a wide-ranging inquiry, under the auspices of Council, into Geelong’s urban and regional design, with terms of reference to include:
* A vision for the sustainable and long-term form of urban and peri-urban Geelong; * How such a vision can be delivered in the context of climate change and/or peak oil constraints; * How urban form will contribute to the development and engagement of community; * How urban form affects the delivery of community services and infrastructure; * The role of urban design in the delivery of affordable housing.’
For comment or more information, contact Bruce Lindsay 0439 035 277
Australian Greens candidate for Ballarat West Leon Dwyer will speak at a community meeting tonight called to support a helipad in Ballarat. He will tell the meeting that he supports the community call for a helipad, but other critical health issues must also be addressed.
“This is an emotional issue, like many others in the community I have been touched by grief from recent events,” said Leon Dwyer.
Leon knew Claire Smith, aka “Becky Bloodnut”, through his involvement in the Ballarat Roller Derby League.
“I have spoken with those working at the coalface in our emergency services and while no one would refuse the offer of a helipad, there are clearly other priorities that must also be addressed.”
“At the same time, everyone feels that if it was one of our friends or family in need of rapid transit we would want the appropriate facilities to be there.”
“People want a health system that first of all keeps us out of hospitals. Mental illness accounts for a significant proportion of admissions to emergency departments, we need serious investment in early intervention mental health services.”
“The emergency department at the Base Hospital is stretched, our paramedics are under staffed, underpaid and work long hours with short brakes.”
“A shortage of GPs puts further pressure on the system. The ambulance depot at the Base Hospital needs work, it is not efficient and difficult to transfer patients there.”
“Some things are unavoidable, there will always be emergencies like Claire's case, which perhaps highlights why we should have had a helipad long ago. Taking the pressure of our emergency system by investing in preventative health allows us to better deal with the unavoidable.”
Greens MP Colleen Hartland wrote to the ombudsman two weeks ago calling for an inquiry into ambulance services. The Greens will be seeking improvements in line with the recommendations of that inquiry.
“The helipad is a capital expense with little ongoing costs and it's something I support along with increased staffing, better working conditions and equipment upgrades.”
“I congratulate the community for their work on this campaign and hope we can work together to get better health outcomes for all.”
For media and comment contact Leon Dwyer via 0415 755 181
The big issues facing the people of Gippsland have escaped the attention of the old political parties in this by-election campaign said Greens candidate, Dr Malcolm McKelvie.
"It's as if the old parties had a policy free zone in relation to climate change, strengthening public health and education, ensuring our food supply is safe before allowing GM foods to be grown and providing adequate dental care.
Where they did make a lot of noise it is obvious to all they are all talk and no action - just look at their track record on opposing raising the aged pension above the poverty line.
"Consider the short term thinking behind the push for a few cents off fuel prices instead of a clear vision for a future free of dependence on oil. Or the hullaballoo about duplicating the highway between Traralgon and Sale instead of the long term thinking of increasing our access to user friendly frequent rail and bus services.
"The old parties prefer to talk about protecting old jobs in outdated industries instead of creating more jobs in new industries like renewable energy, energy efficiency and environmental repair. These jobs will be needed into the future.
"Voting Green isn't a waste of a vote. It has twice the voting power - firstly to tell the other parties what voters are concerned about and if we dont get elected, you get another vote with your second preference. Both are counted equally and will decide who eventualy gets across the line." said Dr McKelvie.
"Greens voters think about big picture issues, not those of postage stamp magnitude".
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
Sarah Hanson-Young, recipient of a prize sponsored by Peter McGauran, has urged Gippsland voters to vote Green in this weekend's by-election.
"Now is the time for people in Gippsland to turn to the Greens. We offer real vision, and we are serious about representing the whole community in the parliament," Senator-elect Hanson-Young said.
"We will be pushing for an increase in the old age pension in budget negotiations after July 1".
The new Greens Senator grew up in East Gippsland and attended Orbost Secondary College. She won the 'Peter McGauran Prize' there for two years in a row. Peter McGauran sponsored the annual prize as a way of fostering community leadership amongst young people in Gippsland.
Sarah takes a Senate position for South Australia, after moving there for University almost nine years ago.
"The Greens will bring both maturity and youth to the balance of power in the Senate" Sarah said. "Bob Brown and Christine Milne have lead the Greens in both balance of power and minority government in Tasmania. Our two new senators, myself and Scott Ludlam, will bring youth and fresh ideas to the Senate."
The new Senate, which takes its place from July 1, features two new Green senators, of whom Sarah is one. Together, the five Greens Senators, and South Australian Nick Xenaphon and Victorian Steve Fielding will control the balance of power in the national parliament's upper house.
Further information:
Sarah Hanson-Young, 0411 524 724
“There are bigger and more important things in this election campaign than where the people of Traralgon buy their postage
stamps”, said Dr Malcolm McKelvie, Greens candidate in the Gippsland by-election.
“For example, are our forests worth more to the community standing or as woodchips?” he asked.
On Friday Senator Bob Brown, Australian Greens leader told a gathering outside the Traralgon Post Office on Friday that Gippslanders earned less than the price of a postage stamp from every tonne of their forests exported as woodchips”, Dr McKelvie said.
“We earn 11c royalties as a community for every tonne of woodchips our forests are turned into. But our forests clean water and provide a valuable sink for the carbon produced by our energy industry, cars and homes”, Dr McKelvie said.
For more information:Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
The Greens in the Ballarat electorate will be reinforcing the message that people control where their preferences go and strongly encouraging voters to make up their own mind.
"The Greens have moved to ban pesky and wasteful 'how-to-vote' cards but both Labor and Liberal opposed that move," said Belinda Coates, Australian Greens candidate for Ballarat.
"Unfortunately some people don't realise that 'how-to-vote' cards are just a guide and people have the power to choose exactly where their preferences go."
"People are disillusioned with the old parties and are looking for a good alternative. I would say to them, vote 1 Greens and then make up your own mind."
"People are asking 'where does my preference go if I vote Greens?' We're saying it's your choice."
The Greens 'how-to-vote' card in the Ballarat electorate will reinforce this message by not recommending preferences. It will simply recommend a 1st preference to Greens candidate Belinda Coates and tell voters to number each box in the order they choose.
"The Greens are not beholden to any party and people shouldn't be either. Voting Greens sends a strong message to the old parties that they need to lift their game. If your party of choice isn't elected, the whole value of your vote goes to the next party of choice."
"A Greens vote is a double value vote - send a message and decide your own preferences."
For more information on how preferences work, go to: http://greens.org.au/getthefacts/preferences
Contact: Belinda Coates on 0400 947 688
Media Release December 13, 2007 Premier ignores economic costs of GM canola The Country Greens Network has called on Premier John Brumby to conduct a full economic audit of the costs of GM canola. Country Greens convener Louis Delacretaz condemned Mr Brumby for refusing to extend Victoria’s moratorium on genetically engineered crops. “Mr Brumby acted in a cavalier fashion and in the face of opposition from the community, farmers and even substantial internal dissent in the ALP,” said Mr Delacretaz. “The full costs of this decision have not been considered. We need to know the likely economic effect, as well as the impact on crop contamination and health.” Before the moratorium is lifted the Country Greens demand that the following conditions are met:

A recently released report called “Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy Plan” outlines a plan to convert the nation's entire energy sector to renewable energy. It could be a blueprint for the Latrobe Valley’s future direction turning it from a coal based economy into a jobs-rich renewable energy region.
Gippsland Green’s candidate; Michael Bond says that Australia with its abundance of sunshine, consistent prevailing winds, miles of coastline and other renewable resources is well placed to be a world leader in these technologies. The Latrobe Valley’s existing infrastructure and skilled workforce would be an ideal place for manufacturing these renewable energy projects” he said.
The plan includes a mix of wind farms and concentrated solar thermal plants with molten salt storage to provide base load power. All are existing technologies that are commercially established in Europe, China and the US. Indeed, Spain is currently building approx 2GW (much more than the capacity of Hazelwood) of solar capacity and China is building and planning on having 100GW of wind power installed by 2020.That’s approx 75 “Hazelwoods” of wind power alone!
“Unfortunately we are dragging the chain” Michael Bond says. “Thousands of desperately needed manufacturing jobs could be created for Gippsland if authorities embraced renewables. The problem is if we don’t take the lead soon, other countries such as China will have set themselves up as the experts in the field and will take these jobs,” he laments.
The plan forecasts that 80,000 jobs could be created in the construction of these plants, with 45,000 on-going permanent jobs in operations and maintenance. This compares with approx 20,000 that would be lost in coal and gas during the transition. “Not only would we have zero carbon emissions but we would have created 1000’s more jobs; I don’t know what we’re waiting for” he says.
The government has set a target of 20% renewables by 2020. The Greens are calling on the government to set a price on carbon and to step up to the plate on its renewable rhetoric. “With uncertainty over a carbon price, financiers won’t be willing to invest. If the government won’t set a carbon price, they need to replicate US President Barack Obama's offer to guarantee loans on renewable projects to kick off this energy revolution” Mr Bond states. For further details and to download the plan in full go to the Beyond Zero Emissions website at: beyondzeroemissions.org
For media and comment contact Michael Bond 0413 315 084
Our Prime Minister has shown himself to be out of ideas when it comes to solving our fuel problems. Greens candidate, Malcolm McKelvie has outlined practical actions the government could take.
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
Greens Candidate for Gippsland By – Election
Greens candidate for the Gippsland by-election Dr Malcolm McKelvie says the Rural Press Club is misguided in its decision not to include him in its lunchtime debate on Wednesday, 18th June.
A forum on BioCarbon has determined that native forests are much more valuable being kept as carbon stores to reduce the damage caused by climate change.
Margaret Blakers from the Green Institute presented at a forum on BioCarbon on Saturday at Traralgon to a packed room. She analysed the government’s Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Green Paper and found that it found that it has flaws.
“By ignoring native forest logging it falsely promotes converting of plantation timber into carbon storage, thereby locking up plantations and encouraging continued logging of native forests.”
“It makes no sense to throw away the carbon already sequested by native forests, instead we should be utilizing our plantation timber for construction and paper making” said Margaret Blakers. “Stopping the logging and clearing of native forests will produce an immediate decrease in Australia’s annual carbon emissions of about 18%.”
“Native forests are best at storing carbon and plantations are best at growing wood” said Ms Blakers.
For more information:
Margaret Blakers 0419 877 325
Andrea Millsom 0417 555 742
“If you could do a PET scan of the state to pick up psychiatrists, inner Melbourne would glow red hot. Gippsland might register a glimmer” said Greens candidate Dr Malcolm McKelvie.
The recent explosion in WA at a gas processing facility highlights the risks being taken with the Santos gas plant on the Snowy river estuary says Greens candidate, Dr Malcolm McKelvie.
Greens member for Southern Metropolitan Region and spokesperson for Roads and Ports, Sue Pennicuik said today that "the Premier’s announcement this week to proceed with construction of the Frankston Bypass1 before the panel inquiring into the project had even finalised its Inquiry once again demonstrated the government’s contempt for Victoria’s planning and environmental assessment processes."
The panel inquiring into the Frankston Bypass is understood to be producing its report to the Minister for Planning, Mr Madden by the 24th April 2009. The minister will then need to determine whether to approve the project.
"Even then we won't be sure that any decision made by the Minister is soundly based because, as with channel deepening and the desalination plant, the Minister sets his own terms of reference and the scope of the Inquiry and controls the process," she said.
"It is well past the time that we had a truly independent environmental assessment process in Victoria," said Ms Pennicuik.
1 Frankston Bypass aka Peninsula Link http://www.seita.com.au/pages/peninsula-link.asp
Justice Osborn has reserved his decision. It could take anywhere from one month to six months to hand down a finding, but of course we are hoping sooner.
The four week trial has been marked by finger-pointing between government logging bodies VicForests and DSE about who is responsible for endangered species. The behavior of those charged with protecting our wildlife has been exposed to public scrutiny and the Supreme Court’s enquiry.
We believe the government doesn’t survey for endangered wildlife before they log old growth forest, because they don’t want to find anything that would prevent logging. The Court heard that VicForests doesn’t employ wildlife experts, and EEG has argued that both VicForests and the DSE sideline the opinion of the government’s biodiversity unit.
We now hope the Minister is fully informed about the very high conservation values in this area. EEG presented evidence of a new species of crayfish in Brown Mountain Creek, plus experts claiming the stands of old growth are high quality habitat for two species of rare frogs, and the Spot-tailed (Tiger) Quoll. The evidence for the Tiger Quoll was heart-breaking – the three last remaining viable colonies are in East Gippsland.
This case has been all about whether irreversible damage would be caused by logging. And as our legal team stated “ You can’t get damage that is more irreversible than extinction.”
The outcome of this case is important for the protection of wildlife in other stands of high conservation value native forests under threat of clearfelling.
http://eastgippsland.net.au/
Greens candidate, Malcolm McKelvie says Labor has dropped the ball on climate change. Labor's budget is rewarding the carbon polluters and wiping out the solar industry.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd must reverse the budget gaffe which has devastated solar power businesses around Australia. A Yarragon based solar power supplier servicing the whole state estimates their business will suffer an 80% decline in grid interactive system installations. The effect is drastic and contrary to the stated policy of the government.
"This is a stunning solar stuff up for Labor's first budget. Australianvoters expected the Rudd government to tackle climate change. Instead,this was an Exocet missile into a key industry for reducing greenhousegas emissions. The removal of the rebate for households earning morethan $100,000 per annum was not thought through.
If either Peter Garrett or Penny Wong were consulted or backed thisabsurd move, they should hang their heads in shame. Their silence hasbeen deafening”, Malcolm McKelvie said.
This episode, along with a string of other greenhouse worsening budgetoutcomes, shows the Rudd government is inept when it comes to tacklingthe need for urgent action on climate change.
However, Brendan Nelson's two billion dollar plan to reduce petrolexcise by 5 cents a litre is in the same category; perverse policy in anage of huge climate change problems.
“Rising fuel prices are triggering changes in our behaviour that need to bepermanent, as we adapt to a world of higher energy and fuel prices” Greens candidate for Gippsland, Dr Malcolm McKelvie said today.
”The law of the world markets can be ruthless” said Dr McKelvie. “The unpleasant truth is that there is more demand than there is supply - and confronting the end to cheap energy and global warming is going to take some good old Australian resilience and adaptability.”
“Politicians are trying to trick us to believe that blow torches or short term price reduction will save the day. But rising prices are here to stay and we’re just going to have to find solutions - and fast.”
“Already we are seeing more car pooling, walking and cycling to work, an increase in public transport use and sudden new plans to build fuel efficient cars. Just as our parents and grandparents did during the wars, we will have to make changes to our lives.
“We are facing a rapid change in the way we will have to go about things. Instead of sending materials to Thailand to be made up and flying them back here, it might soon be cheaper to pay Australians to do the work.
“If rising fuel prices will make Gippsland grown food cheaper than imported fish from Denmark, or cheeses from France, then this should be seen as a positive.” said Dr McKelvie.
“We must get started on the road to adaptation and permanent solutions rather than pinning our hopes on false promises of cheaper fuel one day. It is so important that we don’t just wait for politicians to act. Get fit, get to know your neighbour, buy locally, grow a vegie garden, and reduce consumer goods to the essentials.
“This could be the prompting we’ve all needed.”
For further information please contact: Malcolm McKelvie 0417 364 615
Greens MPs from Victoria, NSW and the ACT will converge on South East NSW to step up the Greens campaign to end the logging of native forests.
Greens MPs Sue Pennicuik (Vic), Lee Rhiannon (NSW) and Deb Foskey (ACT) will visit Eden Chipmill and the South East forests area.
When: Monday 1 September: Eden Chipmill – 11.30am Gnupa area – logged site – 2pm
The MPs will:
Victorian Greens MP Sue Pennicuik said, "Greens MPs have crossed jurisdictional borders to plan how we can best use our combined energies to step up the campaign to stop the logging of our native forests.
"With climate change closing in, the logging of native forests and associated industry is an issue not just for Eden but for the planet.
NSW Greens MP Lee Rhiannon said, "One of the most significant actions we can take is to cut Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions is to stop native forest logging.
"Our precious forests are of far greater value to us as a carbon band than as a shipload of woodchip or a pile of ashes.
Dr Deb Foskey, MLA in the ACT Parliament said, "Native forests should not be felled for woodchips, electricity generation or to drive the profits of overseas companies.
"Along with the threats posed by logging to climate change comes the immediate devastation to our natural environment, threats to flora and fauna and destruction of water supplies," Dr Foskey said.
Additional media release to be issued on day of the Eden chipmill visit.
Bob Brown has thrown his support behind the campaign against the desalination plant near Wonthaggi. The Greens leader will fly down to the Bass Coast site for a protest rally today.
The rally against the $3.1 billion plant will be addressed by Senator Brown and Greens lead Senate candidate in Victoria Richard Di Natale.
"This greenhouse polluting project is every bit as destructive as the pulp mill proposed for the Tamar Valley in Tasmania," Dr Di Natale said.
"The opposition to the desalination plant is clearly growing as more people learn about the climate change implications of this project," he said.
"The Bass Coast Board Riders will today take to the water to spell out the words: 'Desal - The Big Lie$$$' as part of the protest.
"Already local residents, fishers and environmentalists have joined the campaign against the plant, which will spew out the equivalent in greenhouse emissions of 280,000 vehicles on the road for a year.
"As well as carbon emissions, the plant will produce toxic chemical waste and brine. Much of this will be returned to the ocean, threatening local marine habitats.
"The Brumby Government hasn't even conducted an environmental effects inquiry.
"We can do so much more by water efficiencies, recycling and harvesting - as all the reports to the government have made clear.
"Desalination should be our last resort, not the first."
Further information: Richard Di Natale 0425 771 246
Media inquiries: Jim Buckell 0400 465 459
Today, Environment East Gippsland commenced proceedings against VicForests in th
e Supreme Court of Victoria.
A writ was filed with the court this morning and has just been served on VicForests.
“We ask the Court for a permanent injunction to stop VicForests from logging Brown Mountain” said Jill Redwood, Coordinator of EEG. “We also ask the Court to declare that the logging of Brown Mountain is unlawful”.
Brown Mountain is known habitat for at least five species of wildlife listed as vulnerable or threatened under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act. The Court has not yet set a date for the hearing of the case.
For comment: Jill Redwood 5154 0145.
A forum held at Wonthaggi on Saturday 22nd May heard some shocking revelations about Victoria's desalination plant.
Secrecy surrounding the contracts between the government and the desalination consortium led Kenneth Davidson, a senior journalist at the Age, to question the Victorian Auditor General. Mr Davidson found evidence of further secret contracts and indications of the real cost of the plant. “$900 million a year will eventually come from the pockets of Victorians, to pay for the desalination plant and its water”.
He considers this amount to be unaffordable and could send the state broke within five to ten years.

Already hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent by Bass Coast Council on work required in the municipality, as a result of the desalination project. This is money that will not be refunded, according to councillors present at the meeting.
“30,000 tonnes of prescribed toxic waste from the desalination plant will need to be disposed of each year” said representatives of RATWISE - Residents Against Toxic Waste In the South East who expect that this will be sent to Victoria’s only toxic waste dump at Lyndhurst. This facility is fast filling up, with no current plans for an alternative site. The question left hanging was whether Bass Coast could be chosen as a future toxic waste disposal site.
Samantha Dunn, Greens Upper House candidate for Eastern Victoria said, “Melburnians have shown their willingness to change their habits and use less water but the Brumby government is ignoring the community’s conservation of water. With the desalination plant churning out 150 gigalitres (150 billion litres) of water a year, the government has signalled that there will no longer be a need for water conservation, leaving Melburnians with the most energy intensive, environmentally unfriendly and expensive water conceivable”.
The Greens have rejected the government's proposal to abolish the Port of Hastings Corporation and incorporate it into the Port of Melbourne Corporation, under the Ports Integration bill in state parliament this week.
Sue Pennicuik, Greens spokesperson for Ports said. "The Greens have grave concerns about the impact of a larger Port of Hastings on the local environment and on Western Port Bay, which is a Ramsar-listed wetland."
"This is the Year of Biodiversity and our wetlands are havens for biodiversity - we should be protecting and enhancing them. We have already lost too much," she said. "Western Port Bay is a haven for the thousands of water birds that visit it from all around the world every year and a unique tidal mud flat ecosystem that is very precious to Victorians."
"While the Coalition also rejected the Ports Integration Bill, they and the government want to see the Port of Hastings develop full steam ahead into a significant container port," she said. "This is the wrong way to go, we should be looking first at preserving and enhancing the integrity of Western Port for future generations."
"The health and long-term integrity of Western Port is paramount. Any development at Hastings needs to fit in with the long term needs of the ecosystem, not the usual approach of dreaming up a massive development proposal and then trying to 'manage' the environmental damage," she said.
"Western Port has already suffered much damage, in terms of pollution and loss of sea grass and mangroves, due to Port and other activities on its shores," she said. "This level of damage cannot continue into the future and that is the threshold issue that needs to be addressed before any Port expansion plans are entertained."
"The inconvenient truth is most likely that the Port of Hastings should be down scaled, not expanded, in order to preserve the Western Port ecosystem for future generations."
For further comment: Sue Pennicuik – 9530 8399
Amanda Sharp Office of Greens MLC Sue Pennicuik Southern Metropolitan Region
Greens candidate for Western Victoria Marcus Ward says the denial from DSE that Wombat Forest has been opened up to logging from 2012 is not credible.
"The Government's native forest logging plan has been revealed and their damage control is in tatters," said Marcus Ward. "DSE says Wombat Forest will not be logged, but the VicForest allocations are clear as day, come 2012 it's open slather." *
"Geoff Howard must step up and categorically rule out logging in the Wombat Forest and tell us exactly what native forests in Western Victoria will be open to logging after 2012."
"It's not enough to make empty promises before the election, if the Wombat Forest isn't going to be open to logging it has to be removed from the VicForest allocations."
"Promises from the Brumby Government are coming thick and fast in the lead up to the state election, but people are smarter than that, they know the promises hold no water and can't be trusted beyond November, let alone 2012."
"The community has spoken, they don't want logging in the Wombat Forest and after years of work they deserve certainty. The Wombat must be removed from the VicForest allocations."
* attached is a DSE map clearly showing the Wombat Forest included in VicForests Allocated Stands for 2010
Contact: Marcus Ward on 0427 235 254 or 5423 5254
The recent closure of the Tote in Collingwood has generated a lot of public debate about Victoria's liquor licensing regime. Contrary to recent reports, the security requirements for venues with live music were not part of the bill that passed state parliament late last year. The requirement for live music venues to provide security staff is not enshrined in any act of parliament – it is something the government started requiring of licensees long ago.
"The Commissioner can remove the link between live music and the requirement for security at any time, and she should do so now," Victorian Greens spokesperson for the Arts, Ms Pennicuik said today.
"I understand the concern about 'alcohol-fuelled violence' in certain precincts but these smaller live music venues are not where the violence is and are suffering from unintended consequences of the liquor licensing rules," she said.
"The government should make the trigger/s for special licence conditions a history of violence, the level of alcohol consumption, late night operations and patron numbers, NOT the presence of live or amplified music. Any connection between security and live music should be removed."
Liquor licensing policies and laws should support live music and any major changes to licence conditions must be assessed for their impact on the viability of live music venues, as well as their effectiveness in reducing alcohol-related violence.
"The government must abandon its plans for a 2am lockout," she said. "The Greens oppose the government's '2am lockout' bill. The 2008 lock out trial resulted in people wandering the streets, making everyone less safe."
"The government should target violence, not talent. Music doesn't cause violence, as the government's own studies say.* The link between music and licensing requirements should be removed."
*http://www.justice.vic.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/DOJ+Internet/resources/file/ebc215470f28b4d/RIS.pdf
Opinion pieces and letters to the editor
At the outset of this campaign, I said that there were three broad areas that I want to tackle in Council. A new approach to urban planning and design. A more activist approach to local government. Greater transparency and scrutiny.
Local government performs an impressive range of jobs and services, for what is, in the end, not a bad price, the cost of your rates. But things can be better. As citizens and as communities, we are entitled to expect things to be better. We need to tackle what I think is a complacency, a malaise, a ‘business as usual’ approach, that infects government decision-making.
Planning decisions need to do more than deliver developer profitability through suburb-building without neighbourhood shops and footpaths, without public transport, without attractive community spaces, without targets for affordable housing. That sort of planning is a debacle. It is planning for subdivision, not for communities.
I note the editorial outburst in Thursday’s Advertiser regarding Armstrong Creek. It is to be expected that the press will nail their political colours to the mast in any election, and I’ve no doubt Andy Richards is quite capable of defending himself over these issues. Having said that, there are serious policy reasons why this editorialising is at best misconceived on the question of Armstrong Creek. I have previously written of them in this newspaper.
The Armstrong Creek Plan is beset with a fundamental contradiction of trying to accommodate unprecedented urban sprawl with elements of environmentally-sensitive urban design. In an attempt to reduce car-dependence and other ills associated with unreconstructed sprawl, the Plan included concepts such as ‘walkable’ neighbourhoods, ‘greenways’, substantial open space contributions, increased public transport services, and mixed density developments.
THE Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Committee recently inquired and reported into tax changes aimed at promoting investment in carbon sinks.
-->
Carbon sinks may be understood as one side of the climate change equation. If greenhouse gas emissions, such as CO2, are the basic problem, then plants absorbing or sequestering CO2 are key to a solution. It's not all as simple as that, of course. In fact, calculating the capacity of plants to sequester carbon via photosynthesis is an immensely difficult exercise, not least because we are often dealing with complex and highly diverse ecological communities.
Government plans to allow tax deductibility for carbon sink forests split the Senate committee along interesting party lines. ALP senators, not surprisingly, voted for the changes. A dissenting report was produced by the Greens Chris Milne, the Liberals' Bill Heffernan and two National Party senators. Among their concerns was the likelihood carbon sink tax write-offs would have a similar effect to managed investment schemes, producing large-scale conversion and/or buy-up of farming land and shift it to tree cropping.
The carbon sinks legislation, in its current form, would accelerate MIS problems. Its contribution to carbon sequestration would likely be marginal with other perverse outcomes. The concern among dissenting senators is not only in land-use change such as taking land out of food production. Other outcomes are likely to be accelerated destruction of local rural communities, as family farms are sold up, consolidated or converted, people move to regional centres or further afield.
There is no requirement that carbon sink forests actually contribute to biodiversity. This is significant. Recent ANU research shows the net carbon sink benefits of commercial plantations are far lower _ around 40 to 60 per cent lower than for native, bio-diverse forests in southeast Australia. The concept of carbon sink in the legislation is woefully inadequate, essentially equating it to an abstract stand of trees. By comparison, Australia's huge rangelands, if properly managed, would be a major carbon sink, even though they are deserts. There are no estimates on how much carbon will be sequestered by the scheme.
The dissenting senators instead recommended that, among other things, the rules be tightened considerably on carbon sink tax rules so that native vegetation cannot be cleared, carbon sinks must be bio-diverse, prime agricultural land must be excluded from the scheme, and the nature of carbon property rights are clarified.
The carbon sink tax rules are a poorly designed, ill thought out, tax windfall for big plantation companies. The Government would be better advised to withdraw the legislation and do the job properly, sort out what carbon rights are going to look like and how to put vegetation communities into the scheme rather than vague and abstract forests. -- Bruce Lindsay is convenor of the Geelong Greens.
http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2008/09/26/19015_news_pf.html
The Geelong Advertiser Pty. Ltd.
PLANNING along the Victorian coast is overseen by the Victorian Coastal Council (VCC). This body has the responsibility for producing a Victorian Coastal Strategy under the Coastal Management Act for long-term planning of the Victorian coast. The current strategy, written in 2002, is being revised.
A draft strategy came out nearly a year ago. I understood the final version was to be released this Friday. But speculation has it that the document landed on the doorstep of the State Treasury and it went into a spin about the implications of climate change and sea level rise predictions in the document.
It appears the strategy is being held up because the State Government has just realised climate change will have an immense impact on the Victorian coast, and these problems are no longer an abstraction. The strategy is a major planning document. Its application to planning decisions will affect billions of dollars worth of land, property and infrastructure. There was clear warning of this.
VCC chair Libby Mears last November stated that sea-level rise would be at the centre of the document. The VCC was planning for a rise of up to 80cm by 2100. Now it appears there is a great scramble for a political response to a systemic crisis, The Hollowmen style.
Once property prices and development applications might be adversely affected, they jump into action. They are less concerned with responding to silly old things like climate science and the precautionary principle that we act to mitigate environmental damage even without absolute certainty.
It is worth noting that coastal impacts are already being felt, especially in the form of erosion. Furthermore, it is increasingly likely that an 80cm sea-rise by 2100 is wishful, if not fanciful, thinking. Sea-level rise will more likely be measured in metres not centimetres, given the feedback consequences of events such as the melting of Arctic ice. This point is made in detail in the Carbon Equity submission to the draft coastal strategy.
A further important point is made by Deakin University's Geoff Westcott in his submission that a prospective planning crisis is emerging on the coast as climate change impacts combine with development pressures. Rates of development approvals in coastal areas have been significantly higher than inland in our region consistent with the seachange phenomenon.
There seems to be little or no political will to deal with it, at state or local government levels, whether by fixed coastal town boundaries, a development moratorium or strategic retreat from the coast. I guess we'll see when the final strategy emerges from Treasury.
http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/article/2008/09/11/18182_opinion.html
What a terrific story on multiculturalism on the front page of the Journal Sep 8. An under 15 football team that reflects the nature and benefits of multiculturalism. Top points for making it a page one feature.
I was surprised by the "angle" of the story in the Journal (front page Aug 18): "We'll Walk". The report made it seem like council had made a bad decision in blocking a development application for a hotel with up to 60 poker machines, and the sale of alcohol, in a youth area! The way the story was packaged, made it sound like the council blew it: another lost business opportunity for Dandenong!
Jim Reiher
Greens Candidate for the City of Greater Dandenong Council elections in November: Red Gum Ward
Sir, I write in response to your article 'Mitchell Dam supporters slammed' (Bairnsdale Advertiser 31/10) in the interest of setting your readers and Mr Craig Ingram MP straight.
For many years the Australian Greens have been campaigning for better amd more sustainable environmental flows for river systems across this country. This, of course, includes the once-might Murray River. We oppose the north-south pipeline because of the precious water that would be extracted from an already stressed river system.
Melbourne, like Adelaide, needs to wean itself off the Murray. Each year in the Victorian capitial, 500 gigalitres flows from the stormwater straight out to sea. This could be, and must be, captured, reused and recycled to supply Melbourne - no dam required.
Despite what Mr Ingram claims, I have never supported damming the Mitchell River. As a South Australian senator and an Australian Greens senator, I want to see the health of our river systems made a government priority. Envirnomental flows must be obtained and protected so that enough water remains within the rivers for them to survice.
I look forward to discussing these issues with Mr Ingram, and determining how we can work constructively together in the future. He will find my door and phone line are always accessible.
As always, accurate information on Greens policy and media statements can be found on our website,
yours etc
Sarah Hanson-Young,
Greens Senator for South Australia
Mr Madden's report says the planning schemes of four shires will need to be amended to allow the plant and its associated powerlines and water pipelines to be built. http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/DSE/nrenpl.nsf/LinkView/5249619A2A213442CA2573BE007EEAA992FBC7C133A6F520CA2572DA007FAB8B
Section 38(2)of the Planning and Environment Act allows either house of Parliament to vote to disallow a planning scheme amendment tabled by the Minister.
To stop the desalination plant will require the support of all Liberal, National and DLP Upper House members.
submissions
Climate change
Contribution of Armstrong Creek to housing affordability
Advisory Committee
Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline Project 18th March, 2008
Via email michael.crossman@dpcd.vic.gov.au
Dear Ms Mitchell,
I write to express our grave concerns with the Sugarloaf Interconnector Pipeline project.
It appears that this project is being pushed through with a great deal of hast rather than a proper and full examination of its impacts. For example the Project Impact Assessment report is very clear that much of the corridor has not yet been subject to a field inspection with much of the report instead depending on desk top surveys.
Even so the flora and fauna report spells out that project will “require the removal of large areas of remnant native vegetation of at least high conservation significance” (Flora & Fauna Assessment pg22) and further notes that the full extant of such clearing cannot yet be determined.
It is also clear that there will be impacts “on threatened flora and fauna species (including at least two EPBC listed species, nine FFG listed species and 25 DSE listed species)” (Flora & Fauna Assessment pg22).
Without being able to examine the Environmental Management Plan, Offset Management Plan or other mitigating plans which will be offered to reduce the level of environmental damage, we are only able to express our grave concerns at the loss of highly significant flora and fauna.
Victoria has already 30% of our native animals and 44% of our native plants threatened or extinct with 99% of our native grasslands cleared along with 95% of our privately owned land.
This additional level of damage from a 20m to 30m wide disturbance corridor some 70Km long on waterways, flora and fauna cannot be mitigated by rehabilitation and offset planting given the long term nature of the disturbance. The preferred choice is to avoid environmental impacts all together.
To that end, we are also greatly concerned with the downstream environmental impacts of water take-off from the Goulbourn River. Modernising the irrigation infrastructure of the Goulburn-Marry Irrigation District is very commendable however the water saving should then be fully utilized between the irrigators and replenishing rivers like the Goulburn, Campaspe and Loddon.
Melbourne has a number of other water utilization and efficiencies methodologies which could be implemented instead of siphoning this precious resource from the Goulburn.
We would appreciate being able to further clarify this submission to the Advisory committee at the public hearings.
Regards
Louis Delacretaz
Convenor
Country Greens Network
0407 300 188, ldg@softbyte.com.au
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss our submission with you,
I thought I would use my 20minutes to focus on the impact on flora and fauna.
although I would ask you to also note that we are also very concerned with social and economic impacts of the project, the production of greenhouse gases during construction and operation
In fact we would ask that energy for the operation of the pipeline be sourced solely from renewable sources (not offsets)
And the overall unsustainable nature of the pipeline which I will address later I my presentation
We are also very concerned about the impact of the removal of 75 gigalitres per annum from the Goulbourn – Murray region. This water will be lost to that catchment whereas previously water that leaked from irrigation channels was staying within the catchment as ground water.
I have focused on environmental issues because of the small value which these issues have been given in this project. This is can been seen by the weighting in the Triple Bottom Line criteria and scoring table in the Alliance Environmental Management Strategy (EMS pg25) which I’ll discuss in more detail later on.
Any proper quality assurance system or structure design system requires that input documents be completed as a precursor to the design phase.
However the chosen process for this project is to push on making alignment choices before conducting full field surveys needed to determine the impact of scraping clear a 30m construction corridor through remnant native vegetation of high conservation significance.
Victoria is facing a biodiversity crisis. We are the most cleared state in the country with 30% of our native animals and some 44% of our native plants either extinct or threatened (Env Issues paper, CSIRO)
The state government has recognized this and in part is attempting to address it with the Native Vegetation Framework. The framework requires in the first instance that vegetation removal be avoided.
Offsetting is the remedy of a last resort, a remedy that is a much lesser value in protecting our biodiversity.
And to produce net gain any offsetting has to be truly new vegetation of the same type and ecological values. Not some formal protection of existing vegetation. There is no net gain unless vegetation removed is replaced with new vegetation.
To ensure that threatened species are discovered the field studies should be carried out over a period of at least a year. Typical baseline studies go for 5 to 15 years, it’s a nonsense to think you can fully discover the species present in a quick 1~3 month survey.
Even with the limited field work to date, appendix P of the alliances EMS nominates seven EPBC listed species which, depending on the alignment chosen, will be impacted by this project. The Flora and Fauna assessment stated that nine FFG listed species and twenty five DSE listed species could also be impacted.
Clearly the location and extent of these species needs to be determined before the alignment of the pipeline can be chosen. Doing it any other way will lead to either acute bends like the roads in the Dandenongs which meander around trees or wholesale clearing of significant vegetation.
Looking at the scoring criteria setout on page 25 of the Alliance EMS.It is very disturbing that the criteria for the triple bottom line is so strongly biased away from the impact on threatened species. Threatened species are only valued at 7% of the overall score with native vegetation impacts valued at 7%.
As cost is valued at 60% of the score we cannot see how the statement on page 104 that “The importance of native vegetation… is also reflected in the high weighting assigned to the native vegetation component in the multi-criteria TBL assessments” can be justified.
Clearly this projects TBL has not considered the biodiversity hazards facing Victoria. Budgets are important but will have a lesser impact on the state than the continuing threat of our biodiversity crisis.
The overall Greenhouse costings of each route and the project as a whole also need much greater weight than the current 3% for climate impacts
30m construction corridor is an ambit engineering claim. This also reflects the small value (7%) placed on retaining native vegetation or consideration for threatened species.
Surely the construction corridor can be reduce in width to avoid the complete clearing of native vegetation for 70Km.
This is a “silver bullet” approach to solving Melbourne water issue, introducing additional water cannot be seen as a sustainable solution.
Sustainable means steady state solutions not ones that need an ever increasing addition of more resources,
We need to be living within our means, not taking resources from another catchment to satisfy our current thirst.
After all what happens in 15year when Melbourne needs another 200 gigalitres
Wouldn’t we be better to work on reducing our demands?
Human nature is such that without a hard restrain, we all take the easy way out, unless we force ourselves to live within our means we will always need ever increasing supplies of water
And of course there is a limit to the amount of water Australia can provide.
In conclusion the best outcome is for pipeline not to be built as it is an unsustainable project;if it must be built then
I would be pleased to answer any questions you may have.Louis Delacretaz, convenor of the Country Greens Network
Greens environment spokesperson, Greg Barber MLC said: "The Bracks government's proposal for desalination is reportedly for a 150 000 ML plant at a cost of $3 billion dollars. Based on past estimates*, that would generate around 1 million tonnes of CO2."
"One million households in Melbourne don't have a water efficient showerhead. If the government paid for the installation of these, it would save 50,000 megalitres of water at half the cost of desalinated water and end up saving us money on our water bills. That's just a start on the water savings that could be made."
"This proposal is a loser for the environment, greenhouse gases and the household budget."
"Boosting the renewable electricity component is no solution because we already need to double our renewable target and cut electricity use, not increase use."
* For info on the greenhouse emissions of desalination, see: Greenhouse implications of the proposed Sydney desalination plant Australia Institute Webpaper July 2005 http://www.tai.org.au/documents/downloads/WP78.pdf
Their estimate was for a 182 ML per year plant = 945 000 tonnes of eCO2 per year. Note this is sensitive to the 'greenhouse intensity' of the mix of electricity, which in the case of Victorian electricity is more greenhouse intensive.
-- Greg Barber MLC
State Member of Parliament for Northern Metropolitan
Ph: (03) 9348 2622 Facs: (03) 9348 2699
Suite G01, 60 Leicester Street Carlton 3053
GENETICALLY modified canola has jumped containment lines and "contaminated" a commercial beehive in western Victoria, prompting claims that people are not being told enough about what they eat.
Scientific testing on behalf of Greenpeace Australia found Monsanto's "Roundup Ready" canola strain, which is resistant to some herbicides, had contaminated hives near Bannockburn owned by Edmonds Honey.
Victoria lifted a moratorium on growing GM canola in November 2007 after being advised it could be kept separate from non-GM crops.
Greenpeace spokeswoman Louise Sales said the contamination meant people were being denied choice: anyone buying honey from the affected hive could be eating GM food without knowing it.
She said it showed GM canola was "uncontrollable". "We're calling on the Federal Government to keep its election promise — basically not to release GM canola into the environment unless it was produced safe 'beyond reasonable doubt'. We don't believe it stands up to that test," Ms Sales said.
The health effects of GM canola remains contentious, though it is regarded as safe for consumption by the Commonwealth Office of the Gene Technology Regulator and the Australian Academy of Science.
Local farmers and Melbourne restaurateur Dure Dara joined a protest against the spread of GM material into neighbouring crops. The beekeeper affected by the contamination, John Edmonds, was less worried. He was concerned it could affect sales and said labelling should be improved. But he said beekeepers had been using GM cotton for years without negative health impacts.
A spokeswoman for the Federal Government said the health risks of GM canola had been extensively investigated and found not to differ from non-GM canola. GM labelling standards were being reviewed, with a report due mid-next year.
The State Government said the potential impact of GM canola on bee-keepers was considered in a review before the state moratorium was lifted.
Mr Edmonds said he would report the campaigners to police for removing and testing his honey frames.
http://www.theage.com.au/national/uproar-as-gm-canola-contaminates-beehi...
After the tragic fires in February which cost so many lives and destroyed thousands of homes, the Victorian community opened their hearts and produced an overwhelming response. More than 180 million dollars was generously donated to the bushfire appeal and tens of thousands of people registered to volunteer their time.
There will be further opportunities for volunteers as the longer term effort is required to rebuild communities. This webpage is a collection of contact details and organisations that are involved in the recovery and rebuilding.
If you're affected by bushfire and looking for help visit the Department of Human Services' information page at www.dhs.vic.gov.au/emergency/current-events/bushfire or the ABC Bushfire Help Page.
Victorian Bushfire Goods and Services Registry set up by the Fitzroy Oxfam Organisation. Both donors and recipients can register their interest or goods and services directly on the site and await a reply. http://bushfireaid.wikispaces.com/
Government Bushfire Volunteer Hotline 1300 366 356 www.volunteeringaustralia.org/volunteer
Grocon is manage the cleanup program on behalf of government and expects to clear up to 80,000 tons of debris for free. If you would like to work with Grocon on the clean-up and demolition program email them at firecleanup@grocon.com.au
The Victorian National Parks Association has prepared a Q&A fact sheet about the Victorian Bushfires 2009 which can be downloaded from VNPA Victorian bushfires 2009
This is the highest standard we can achieve on the basis of all the work that has been brought together ...
He also stated:
The national standard has been through an incredibly thorough process. The CSIRO has gone through it with a fine-tooth comb ...
I was therefore surprised to hear on AM this morning the CSIRO expert -- I gather it is the relevant expert -- claiming that this is a significant weakening of the code. Since the minister made that statement, has his government received or sought any independent advice from the CSIRO?
Hon. J. M. MADDEN (Minister for Planning) -- I welcome Mr Barber's question, because it is a very astute question from Mr Barber, given that he is obviously listening to the radio in the morning. It is very useful for him to listen to the radio. I will bet you other members of the opposition wish they had been listening to 3LO this morning as well.
Mrs Coote -- It's not 3LO any more; it's 774. You're wrong!
Hon. J. M. MADDEN -- Thank you very much.
Honourable members interjecting.
The PRESIDENT -- Order! Mr Leane!
Hon. J. M. MADDEN -- We as a government have recognised the need for people affected by the bushfires to start the rebuilding process, to return to their communities and to re-establish their lives. That is why we have introduced tougher building standards for homes, targeting high bushfire risk areas, to help better protect lives and property.
We have adopted the highest Australian standard available. It is the most stringent and is better targeted than the previous standard. I just want to make that absolutely clear. The standards committee, of which the CSIRO is a member, considered the new bushfire standard over a number of years and consulted widely.
This standard was agreed on and was due to be adopted nationally in May 2010, but in light of the devastating bushfires we brought forward the adoption date to allow Victorian communities to rebuild their homes to that higher standard.
The new building standard has six risk categories or bushfire attack levels, compared to the current four categories. These new requirements ensure a more detailed risk assessment for each building site, addressing different levels of exposure that could result from different levels of fire attack. I am advised that the CSIRO supported the 1090 kelvin temperature in its formal response to the Australian Building Codes Board consultation regulatory impact statement, the temperature which the majority of other stakeholders, including the fire authorities, supported and which the board, the Victorian government and the Australian Capital Territory government have adopted. I understand that the CSIRO did not raise any other technical or policy matters in that submission. It is worth bearing that in mind.
Can I also reinforce that under the previous standard only homes in certain bushfire-prone areas were covered. The new standard is statewide, allowing for a site-by-site assessment of homes to offer people across the state the highest protection available.
We also announced that the royal commission would inquire into all aspects of the recent bushfires including questions relating to improving fire safety of housing and other buildings, and materials used in construction. If further recommendations or comments or qualifications are made by the royal commission, the government will look at adopting those.
To assist homeowners whose principal place of residence was destroyed by the bushfires, the bushfire appeal fund announced that all homeowners will receive a rebuilding and recovery grant of $50 000. This consists of $35 000 for rebuilding and $15 000 to replace contents and will assist people in meeting any extra or additional costs of rebuilding, particularly if it means raising the standard of the housing in line with the building code. This will allow people more certainty and more confidence. We are committed to ensuring that we do what we can on the best possible advice on the best possible available standard -- that is, a national standard -- and we have adopted this sooner rather than later to assist people with rebuilding their lives.
Supplementary question Mr BARBER (Northern Metropolitan) -- The minister did not say yes or no in response to my initial question. Does he stand by the statement, 'This is the highest standard that we can achieve.'?
Hon. J. M. MADDEN (Minister for Planning) -- I welcome Mr Barber's supplementary question. Can I say that there are a number of areas that put in no doubt at all that this is the highest available standard. One is the flame temperature on which this standard is based, which I understand is 1090 kelvin. That is certainly much higher than any threshold that has been in place before. After investigations into the most recent bushfires we may find, as I think the preliminary advice is, that the threshold will be even greater, because the flame temperature was quite high, between 1300 and 1400, so I would expect that there will be comments made in relation to that.
But in terms of a national approach on a highly technical standard, I think we can have confidence that this is the highest standard.
It is also the highest standard above and beyond what was presented before, because whereas this applied to areas under various planning overlays, or bushfire-prone area nomination, this will be applied to all dwellings for which a building permit is sought going into the future. All dwellings will be considered. Even for people living in the suburbs all dwellings will be considered in this light. Given the description within that standard and the prescriptive nature of the threshold issues and the tests, those issues will either be discounted immediately or people will fall into one of the six risk category areas and the permit will be assessed accordingly. I am confident that this is the highest possible standard that can be attained. I am confident that the scope of all dwellings right across the state makes it the highest possible standard.
No doubt there will always be views on what can or what could or what should happen, in relation to standards. This has been through a thorough process. Standards Australia has voted on it and it has been adopted. If there are those who have either a sense that it should be a higher standard in any particular technical area, no doubt they will have the opportunity to make submissions to the royal commission. If there are any recommendations made by the royal commission, we will consider those thoroughly, with the hope of implementing them in one fashion, if that is possible.